Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They spy on users, steal your data and and track you with every click in their software. They also lie about Opt-Outs and they deleting hosts rules.
This applies not only to Avast Anti-Virus, but also to CCleaner, Speccy and other programs from the company.
Beside of that, they were already caught while they have sold user data in the three-digit million range and even the CEO's statement was edited several times to cover up any inferences about involved names. Nothing has changed since 2020/22.
For reference what this is about: https://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2024/02/software-provider-avast-will-pay-165-million-compromising-consumers-privacy
Here is a scan with multiple malware scanners
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/76db57c64a1e5d9c604fde6e729751594a8a2d65569551ccb8d13b7f58c16281?nocache=1
While this is never a 100% guarantee it is highly unlikely anything is wrong with the game data. Also take note that client scanners will not always have the same result or false positives as the enterprise versions. As in the link above Avast says the file is clean as well.
For reference idp.generic stands for Identity Detection Protection generic signature.
Meaning the file behavior is uncertain but there is no matching signature to an actual malware family type. Which most times just means nothing really has been detected it just has elements that are also present in malware or in potential unwanted programs (PUP) which can be anything.
I seen files getting flagged because they contained previous recognized name flagged .ico files or favicons which under specific conditions can be used malicious but most cases are perfectly safe and your system has hundreds of those by default.
Here is the guide to add file exclusions from Avast itself.
https://support.avast.com/en-us/article/antivirus-scan-exclusions/#pc
Though with regard to privacy your better of going to a competitor. Or simply forgo it and use the build in malware scanner protection which for most people is honestly good enough.
In this case, one of the identifier of the exe is actually pretty generic, as stated in the namesake of the protection method - the Copyright property. It literally reads: "Fill out your copyright notice in the Description page of Project Settings.".
Dang it, devs!
Cutting corners now, are we?
Here's a question to you all; Why did Avast or any AV quarantine an .exe?
Simple answer -it's *CHANGED* that why! It detected a difference from the previous version in it's logs.
If dev's dont submit it then it's flagged as a possible danger.
Stop making assumptions about which is right or wrong, it's better to flag a false positive than miss it entirely and it to be a virus.
It's like AI it learns to look out for changes
If its a troll you got me lol, if not wtf?