Political Messaging is against Steam forum rules and guidelines

[Crakerhack]

The devs are the only ones allowed to grandstand and give us their ♥♥♥♥ takes on geo political issues. Supported you guys the whole way until you decided you were going to start polluting this place with your political virtue signalling. Make the game. That's what we paid for. Not who you support in the wars around the world.

[Qau'lthir]

Anarchy is the death of civilization and anybody who considers themselves to be suitable to survive in such a "system" are usually the weakest, most pathetic, human beings you could ever consider.

[craig234]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย WAKE UP - STOP FIGHTING !:

so.... we're NEVER gonna get anywhere

That's easy to agree with.

I meant "stop voting for THEM", and by "them" I meant the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ that are at the top currently. I have NO IDEA how that wasn't clear. (how would "not voting ever" make any sense ? how would we decide on things to be done as a people ?)

Where did I say you said stop voting? Nice strawman/false quote.

Bernie Sanders is not an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Sheldon Whitehouse is not an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
AOC is not an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Ilhan Omar is not an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Elizabeth Warren is not an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
I could go on with dozens more of great leaders you wrongly call ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

2) progressives, eh ? I have met quite a few "progressives" in my time and from all over the political spectrum... and two things are true about them : FIRST, they only want to change what does not affect their wealth and belongings

Then you met phony 'progressives' - like I said, never heard of real ones.

SECOND, they never actually change anything significant

Because too many IDIOTS we won't name for your sake call them ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ instead of voting for them.

[The Big Sleep]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Qau'lthir:

Anarchy is the death of civilization and anybody who considers themselves to be suitable to survive in such a "system" are usually the weakest, most pathetic, human beings you could ever consider.

Aw. You're adorable. In my not inconsiderable experience through the decades, people who generalize strangers as "weak, pathetic human beings" with such venomous certainty have never been the staunchest of emotional oaks themselves.

But keep preening, tough guy. Fake it till ya make it and all that. lol.

[U-give-♥-a-Bad-Name]

again... how does NOT voting for this or that politician mean that the WHOLE world descends into chaos ? And, again... I'm not advocating that destroying everything that has been built so far is the "thing to do".
I'm saying stop putting jackasses in control of everything because they've succeeded in hypnotizing you into a deadly fight against your neighbor.

[Qau'lthir]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย eatmeəɯʞᴎᴉᴚᴩ:

Aw. You're adorable. In my not inconsiderable experience through the decades, people who generalize strangers as "weak, pathetic human beings" with such venomous certainty have never been the staunchest of emotional oaks themselves.

But keep preening, tough guy. Fake it till ya make it and all that. lol.

Strangers who identify themselves as anarchists, yes. But hey, if you get insulted by that then you're welcome to crawl back to whatever Reddit hugbox that agrees with your opinions.

[Kamuflaro]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Qau'lthir:

Strangers who identify themselves as anarchists, yes. But hey, if you get insulted by that then you're welcome to crawl back to whatever Reddit hugbox that agrees with your opinions.

You are a troll.

[Kaleygh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Gold:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย conejeitor:

While Ukraine might hold some blame, just Russia have nukes. It´s only natural for a developer, or a human, to worry about it and try against.

how about dev try searching information about ukraina bioweapon lab that may kill most russian? or ukraina "purge"? and bringing nuke is part of strategy so the land army not bombed, and russian army give food to ukrainan people not mention by dev?

like i said, both of them have part to blame. if i said who is worse, that is ukraina goverment that create the problem fist. But when civil get killed (bombing sniper in building) i blame russia. Both have part to blame.

Thumb rule, never blindly trust politican and mainstream media. and never side with politic should the best move. help refugee is the best dev can do.

Really, you believe that biolab BS? Are you serious ? Ukrainians and Russians are both slavic people, even if such a weapon was possible to make (it is not btw) it owuld affect both countries.
I suggest you stop getting your "facts" from the Kremlin. They used the biolab lie before, at least two times. Last time it was in January when the riots in Kazakhstan started.
Russia started a war against a neighbouring country. Russian soldiers are raping, looting, killing and torturing innocent civilians. If the devs decide to stand up for what is right in their view (whatever side that might be for them), good for them. People need to grow a pair and stand up for what they believe is right. If you dont like their view, dont play the game, simple. But do some research before parroting russian propaganda.

[Kamuflaro]

Interesting, I missed reports of those even though they exist. Kudos.

[Cosmic Cat]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kaleygh:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Gold:

how about dev try searching information about ukraina bioweapon lab that may kill most russian? or ukraina "purge"? and bringing nuke is part of strategy so the land army not bombed, and russian army give food to ukrainan people not mention by dev?

like i said, both of them have part to blame. if i said who is worse, that is ukraina goverment that create the problem fist. But when civil get killed (bombing sniper in building) i blame russia. Both have part to blame.

Thumb rule, never blindly trust politican and mainstream media. and never side with politic should the best move. help refugee is the best dev can do.

Really, you believe that biolab BS? Are you serious ? Ukrainians and Russians are both slavic people, even if such a weapon was possible to make (it is not btw) it owuld affect both countries.
I suggest you stop getting your "facts" from the Kremlin. They used the biolab lie before, at least two times. Last time it was in January when the riots in Kazakhstan started.
Russia started a war against a neighbouring country. Russian soldiers are raping, looting, killing and torturing innocent civilians. If the devs decide to stand up for what is right in their view (whatever side that might be for them), good for them. People need to grow a pair and stand up for what they believe is right. If you dont like their view, dont play the game, simple. But do some research before parroting russian propaganda.

It's not the Ukrainian government or the people that run the labs, it's private US based corporations that are working for the US government.
The biolabs were unveiled in a big scoop by bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva and her team as far back as 2017.
The reason you and me didn't hear about it until much later is that our MSM decided to keep quiet about it. Doesn't take a genious to understand why.

Original source: https://dilyana.bg/bulgarian-journalist-confronts-robert-kadlec-over-the-us-secret-bio-weapons/

[Kamuflaro]

Pentagon has provided much of the funding for labs built by the United States in former Soviet states to upgrade biosecurity in those countries partly in response to the anthrax attacks in the U.S. that started just a week after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington.
Looks like Russia tries to use that defense measure against US. Several times already.
A report from 2018 on Russian state television claimed that a U.S.-funded lab in the former Soviet republic of Georgia was cover for biological weapons research. But there was nothing suspicious there.
Source (blocked for US military): https://theintercept.com/2022/03/17/russia-ukraine-bioweapons-misinformation/

[The Big Sleep]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Qau'lthir:

Strangers who identify themselves as anarchists, yes. But hey, if you get insulted by that then you're welcome to crawl back to whatever Reddit hugbox that agrees with your opinions.

In honor of Reddit then.... Tell me you don't know anything without telling me don't know anything.

You know anarchist thought and theory extends back as far as ancient Greece? That it has internal sectarian differences? That entirely, fundamentally opposed systems exist inside anarchist theory? That "anarchist" =/= "black bloc"?

Also, and I think it was pretty clear, my sympathy for anarchism in the theoretical doesn't extend to my faith in its practical viability. I think human nature would tend to get in the way. My main criticism of a stateless system of free association where no single entity holds a monopoly on violence is that both nihilists *and* true believers are usually dangerous when they don't think there will be consequences.

So, yeah, taking into account the fact that I don't think it is actually quite feasible, I still identify ideologically as an anarchist. Only you don't have any ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idea what that actually *means*, because everything you know about anarchist thought came from, ironically, whichever ideological echo chamber (reddit hugbox... lulz) *you* prefer.

But, honestly, I think the other guy is right and yer prolly just a troll. Even if unintnetionally.

[U-give-♥-a-Bad-Name]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย eatmeəɯʞᴎᴉᴚᴩ:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Qau'lthir:

Strangers who identify themselves as anarchists, yes. But hey, if you get insulted by that then you're welcome to crawl back to whatever Reddit hugbox that agrees with your opinions.

In honor of Reddit then.... Tell me you don't know anything without telling me don't know anything.

You know anarchist thought and theory extends back as far as ancient Greece? That it has internal sectarian differences? That entirely, fundamentally opposed systems exist inside anarchist theory? That "anarchist" =/= "black bloc"?

Also, and I think it was pretty clear, my sympathy for anarchism in the theoretical doesn't extend to my faith in its practical viability. I think human nature would tend to get in the way. My main criticism of a stateless system of free association where no single entity holds a monopoly on violence is that both nihilists *and* true believers are usually dangerous when they don't think there will be consequences.

So, yeah, taking into account the fact that I don't think it is actually quite feasible, I still identify ideologically as an anarchist. Only you don't have any ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idea what that actually *means*, because everything you know about anarchist thought came from, ironically, whichever ideological echo chamber (reddit hugbox... lulz) *you* prefer.

But, honestly, I think the other guy is right and yer prolly just a troll. Even if unintnetionally.

you know... I wanted to answer in such a way, but... some "poor" souls here (and everywhere, really) prefer to focus on a word that THEY pick to be the most important instead of trying to understand the whole sentence...
Kudos to you, though :)

[Floppium]

I see a lot of people complaining. What is supposed to happen? What are the developers supposed to do?