also a way to say first second and third grammatical persons in alliance chat like me you him

A facepalm emote would be amazing. So many times, people do things that make me wanna facepalm.

For all of you that like the idea of the ? emote it already exists 250 gems will buy the Napoleon chin rub (rare emote) it has ? popping around his head / also the ( ? ) already exists in text from as (Why?) but it's not always available (rare text)... Your welcome General.

why cant they add chat?

try to chat with russian or chinese, i guess they want to keep it international, eazy comms.

add in lobby chat PLS, before enter the battle

Publicado originalmente por Player Four:

For all of you that like the idea of the ? emote it already exists 250 gems will buy the Napoleon chin rub (rare emote) it has ? popping around his head / also the ( ? ) already exists in text from as (Why?) but it's not always available (rare text)... Your welcome General.

I was gunna say. Been a whilst since I played, and for a lot of whats popping up there was already a thing when I was playing last... Do folks not actually look anymore?

End of the day, if they want to add more communication, then just add a damn text chat. It's not like people playing a real game of risk in person wouldn't be able to talk to each other.

Text suggestions:
- "I am risking it all"
- "Ruse incoming"
- "That was ...not smart"
- "Trust me... once"
- "Peace was never an option"
- "Alliance expired"
- "Checkmate incoming"
- "Let's dance"
- "Temporary truce?"
- "Called your bluff"
- "Worth the risk"
- "Karma strikes back"
- "Last chance offered"
- "Bad move, partner"
- "You risked it all"

It'd be great if you could have something saying which country you're trying to take in Classic. "I am taking N. America." "I am taking Australia."

Also, "Watch out for [color]." as a defensive complement to "Attack [color]."

I don't understand why the people at the Risk department of SMG allow some games to be 100% against one player in ranked 1 verses 1 play. In some ranked 1 verses 1 games, the bot almost only attacks one player or in some games, does only attack one player. In those unfair games the player that does not get attacked by the bot, gets to bounce around the map taking one territory after another all game that are defended by 2 or 3 of my units and the other player loses no units. This happens over and over, but when I attack their territory defended by 2 of their units, I lose either 1, 2, or 3 of my units! This last the whole game until I am so far behind that it is impossible for me to be able to come back to win. The other player takes 10 to 20 territories of mine that are defended by 2 or 3 of my units without them losing any units. While I can either do that zero times all game or only late in the game when it is already impossible for me to win. I don't understand how that can be allowed in a ranked game. People at the Risk department of SMG, please just stop doing this. If this is the AI behind this, please rewrite some code so that the bot and dice rolls are more fair and balanced.

SMG likes $$$ so why not allow me to permanently unlock one or two slots worth?

Also, I have been one of SMGs harshest critics, but I can see you folks truly attempting to improve the game. Thats awesome.

Maybe do proper analysis of all the discord feedback left untouched for years. There are several pieces of "low hanging fruit" that have been overwhelmingly upvoted by the community over the years, but we stopped bothering as it was clear that SMG was not interested.

Also, heads up; you have eight months until the game developed by the community you ignored comes out. I would be very concerned if I were you

~Bane

Taking in account for the last post that I left, I have played over 3 thousand and 900 hours of Risk. I also have played over 17 thousand and 300 games. I have played several thousand ranked FFA games and I have played several thousand 1 verses 1 online ranked games. I have a good record and I have a lot of experience with this game and I know what I am talking about. I am sure that there are plenty of players that might be smarter than me, but I do have off-the-chart awareness levels and I am very good at reading people and figuring out the motives behind things. There has been many disconnections that I have been given losses for, when my game has completely frozen up and I could not attack or anything. There has also been many ridiculously unfair, lopsided games that were big time in the other players favor. These same things will eventually happen to all other players that eventually play thousands of games like I have, or that means that there is a whole lot of other stuff that is going on with the people at the Risk department of SMG.

Why not let the user type what they want 🤔 or let us add them like emotes but for free

just add in game chat. When I play the board game, we talk, we decieve eachother, it's a part of the game.

Just add normal chat lol ? so people can be toxic as in other games hahahahaha