Devs, thanks for the game!

[DreamSword Souty]

I'm glad that you have make this game, it's such a fun one!
Thanks!

[DreamSword Souty]

Publicado originalmente por Oyeah:

Publicado originalmente por DreamSword Souty:

So you're completely off topic regarding my post.
So please stop “participating”.

To stay on topic, what is this post even about? A postcard would have been more fitting. This isn’t a topic; it’s fan mail. And what are you thanking them for, exactly? They didn’t create RISK. The original board game wasn’t that bad to start with, but there’s a lot wrong with this digital version! They don’t deserve fan mail for it. They should be grateful instead and thank their players for paying for their premium 'Bite,' not the other way around.
And if you want an opinion on your post, I find it painfully awkward.

I think they deserve it. I don't care about your opinion.
If you disagree, you can, you know... just leave it :)

[Thurston Forbush III]

Publicado originalmente por DreamSword Souty:

Publicado originalmente por Oyeah:

You should never project your own cognitive abilities onto others. It’s glaringly obvious to anyone with an average IQ of around 100 that you’ve been using AI to generate your replies. No human responds one moment with broken English and the frustrated tone of a teenager, only to switch to perfect paragraphs and coherent arguments, cranking out responses within 3 to 10 minutes after a post.
While I know my English is decent, I also occasionally use ChatGPT or a tool like Word for spell-checks—after all, English isn’t my native language. Initially, I thought you were just using AI to translate your own comments. But then I was informed that you can simply copy-paste your prompts into these AI programs to generate entire replies. I tried it myself, and guess what? It uses the exact same techniques as your posts to produce what, at first glance, seem like adequate responses. But once you know this trick, it becomes immediately recognizable.
So, it’s not a theory anymore; it’s a proven fact as far as I’m concerned that you’ve made a fool of yourself. First, by taking the moral high ground while actually cheating by blatantly abusing AI tools in your dialogue. In my eyes, this just shows you have a pretty low character, and honestly, I find it quite pathetic.

Oh, this is truly entertaining—you’ve crafted an entire theory around my supposed “AI dependency,” as if you’ve stumbled upon some grand revelation. Yet all you’ve really done is publicly reveal your own obsession with catching me in some imagined “cheat.” Do you honestly think that the ability to form coherent sentences and respond effectively requires AI intervention? Because, ironically, that assumption reveals more about your own limitations than anything you’re projecting onto me.

The best part? You admit to personally using AI tools, as if spell-checks and language aids were some innocent dalliance for you but a nefarious cheat for anyone else. And while I appreciate the effort you’ve poured into analyzing and reverse-engineering my replies, I have to wonder: how much of this fixation on proving me “guilty” of AI use is actually about avoiding any real engagement on the points I make? You’re building this elaborate accusation that, at best, just showcases your frustration with the fact that my responses outmatch your own attempts.

So let’s lay it out clearly: if you genuinely believe I’m relying on AI, why are you so invested in declaring it? For someone who claims to know what’s going on here, you seem pretty rattled by the idea that someone could respond thoughtfully and in complete sentences. But let’s say, hypothetically, I were using AI—would it really change anything? It seems more like you’re trying to discredit the content rather than address it, and that’s as transparent as it gets.

Finally, your attempt at the moral high ground is honestly laughable. You’re so busy accusing me of using tools to “cheat” that you’ve overlooked the irony that you’re doing the exact same thing. What you see as a “gotcha” moment is really just an elaborate self-own, proving only that you’re obsessively invested in a distraction rather than in having any meaningful conversation. So maybe focus a little less on trying to prove your theory, and a bit more on bringing something of substance to the table.

This, this right here. This is my proof.

[DreamSword Souty]

Publicado originalmente por Thurston Forbush III:

Publicado originalmente por DreamSword Souty:

Oh, this is truly entertaining—you’ve crafted an entire theory around my supposed “AI dependency,” as if you’ve stumbled upon some grand revelation. Yet all you’ve really done is publicly reveal your own obsession with catching me in some imagined “cheat.” Do you honestly think that the ability to form coherent sentences and respond effectively requires AI intervention? Because, ironically, that assumption reveals more about your own limitations than anything you’re projecting onto me.

The best part? You admit to personally using AI tools, as if spell-checks and language aids were some innocent dalliance for you but a nefarious cheat for anyone else. And while I appreciate the effort you’ve poured into analyzing and reverse-engineering my replies, I have to wonder: how much of this fixation on proving me “guilty” of AI use is actually about avoiding any real engagement on the points I make? You’re building this elaborate accusation that, at best, just showcases your frustration with the fact that my responses outmatch your own attempts.

So let’s lay it out clearly: if you genuinely believe I’m relying on AI, why are you so invested in declaring it? For someone who claims to know what’s going on here, you seem pretty rattled by the idea that someone could respond thoughtfully and in complete sentences. But let’s say, hypothetically, I were using AI—would it really change anything? It seems more like you’re trying to discredit the content rather than address it, and that’s as transparent as it gets.

Finally, your attempt at the moral high ground is honestly laughable. You’re so busy accusing me of using tools to “cheat” that you’ve overlooked the irony that you’re doing the exact same thing. What you see as a “gotcha” moment is really just an elaborate self-own, proving only that you’re obsessively invested in a distraction rather than in having any meaningful conversation. So maybe focus a little less on trying to prove your theory, and a bit more on bringing something of substance to the table.

This, this right here. This is my proof.

Ok