Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'd probably have however many they let you save going all the time.
Unfortunately...no one is listening,
And if they were this would be a complicated upgrade,
I'd rather they simply upgrade the join system and balanced the field in what we have.
There would probably have to be a different set of rules related to taking your turn. For instance, if you don't respond within a certain amount of time, in a regular game, a bot takes over for the convenience of the other players. In the synchronous scenario, if someone decides to wait a week before they take their turn are the rest of the players at their mercy?
If so, isn't this a Godsend to stallers?
I'm skeptical. It would have to be a completely different mode of gameplay. I see some people would like to play this way, but I'm not interested in getting a notification that I'm up, three days after I took my last turn. That's just dragging things out, unnecessarily, to me.