Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
TLDR: The game is a missed opportunity, I cry in frustration.
Something like that.
In the first paragraph, the reviewer mentions that they loved all of the Annapurna games but are disappointed with this one. They say that the gameplay consists of left and X/Square, the music becomes boring, the player has no creative freedom, the Simon Says are easy, and the game is not a "Rythym" game. The graphics are spectacular but the gameplay is not rewarding.
The second paragraph is a request for ideas on how to make a music game more interesting.
In the third paragraph, the commenter mentions that Annapurna Interactive produces the best games, but this game is one of the worst. It has weak gameplay and a repetitive soundtrack.
Completely disagree, the gameplay is amazing, perhaps you have either no appreciation for music or have zero musical talent.