Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Automata is lowkey more polished but just in gameplay, and that's because they wanted to keep the Replicant remake 1:1.
So enjoy. :)
In terms of original release date (not remaster), this is also before Automata.
But I played Automata first, and I don't regret it. It's definitely the better game by a large margin.
I also think that the story works better in some ways. The feeling of discovery "oh, this is <that thing> in the past" when I played Replicant.
Of course, I don't really know what it's like to play Replicant first, but I think I would have enjoyed it less. Depending on my mood I might have given up because of the gameplay and never played Automata.
You will not understand all "easter eggs" and referincies, though, if you play games in a random order.
NieR Reincarnation isn't as good as the full PC/Console games, so you won't miss a thing story wise by skipping the Mobile Game which has terminated its service.
The Drakengrad Games are from the PS2/3 era. So, a bit old. They also play not an important role, to understand the story of NieR. If you are interested, instead of playing those games, you can read a wikia about them or watch a YouTube explanation video about these. But it is not necessary for the Story of NieR.