Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But it's just a remaster. It's not as polished as Automata and even at the base price Automata is cheaper. It is what it is, but it's just strange to me.
Needs to go at less than $26 before I consider making that purchase, especially since Nier is pretty much dead now.
They completely retooled the combat to be closer to Automata. Its a mix of the original with some automata speed
Price is cause its newer, so that makes sense. The real question is why Automata is still so expensive for a 2017 game.
2. it's a remastered or what they says 'an upgraded version'. well it's true, there is a significant upgrade from the ps3 version, they overhaul the game and its get better. the combat, the mechanic, the graphic, the characters model etc (i've played the ps3 version and i must say they did a great job 'upgrading' this game)
3. it's square enix
Don't worry it was weird that it costs that much more for the content it offers.