Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That aside, I'm in Phase 10 right now and I'm enjoying it so far. I can understand why many people say Robotics;Notes is the weaker entry in the series since the routes themselves (again, if you can even call them as such) are about the same lenght as the Chaos;Head Noah routes, and it has some pacing issues, but I like that the writing here isn't always just in the perspective of the MC like Linear Bounded Phenogram.
Also SciADV usually changes perspectives a lot. It's just that S;G never does because >solitary observer.
Basically, the difference here is that when the Robotics Club starts working for example, while is mostly in the MC perspective sometimes it switches to the perspective of another character in that same situation, while when in the Newspaper Club it was always in the perspective of the MC. Although just to be clear that isn't necessary a bad thing of course, as part of the fun ride in Chaos;Child was allowing the player to guess who the killer was, I was just surprised to see that you get to know the perspective of the other characters a lot more here than just in particular situations.