Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In my case, I like Troy a lot, but the Pharoah is better in 2 very (or most) important things:
/ campaign AI - and anti player bias and faction confederation breaks campaign in Troy
/ combat - Pharaoh's combat is superior to Troy, and maybe one of the best in historical Total War
Very much so, it's like Troy was crucified because was exclusive to Epic and even when was given for free in the first 24h, people went on an unnecessary hate rampage.
Same thing to Pharaoh, now that Dynasties has been released with a price cut and a huge updates, people moans and stifle their nose of entitlements.
No wonder CA isn't going to release Medieval III if players have such an obnoxious attitude,
CA has rotted from the inside. It's living off the legacy and money it made from previous titles.
Likely a bot, or an NPC.
It was free on Epic, not that hard to have Troy.