Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Whereas WITE shines with multiplayer, SCW1 shines with the AI. I believe that the developers created this game and its mechanics with the AI in mind. The mechanics are easier and less complex, so the AI logic performs better. I find the AI extremely capable in SCW1 whereas in WITE I find the AI less so.
Both are worth the purchase.
Although Im still hesitant on Strategic Command. Based on the trailer and your response, I think I will pick it up this summer though. So thank you for taking the time to answer me !
WITE is on another level and is more like an operational simulation of the WW2 eastern front. There's no way that you could play it without reading and constantly referring to the manual (at least on your first attempt). A good middle-of-the-road example between the two games would probably be the Decisive Campaigns series, if you've played those. Both games are much more focused on logistics than SC:WW1, though.
I find this more "fun". It's easier to finish a game in an evening or two, though arguably lacks some depth so you'd get more out of the other games if you care about simulating specific equipment types and aircraft models etc.