Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
-x wasn't created by Hispanics, though. It was created by another culture imposing their own insecurities on mine with their ignorance of my culture. -x is truly someone misappropriating someone else's culture.
"Latinx" was invented by two Puerto Ricans.
Karlach talking like she's from the 90's is enough dissonance already, but 2020's linguistic parasites certainly do not belong in a fantasy setting. Might as well then have everyone talk in TikTok lingo then if it doesn't matter.
(in before the flames!)
If your intention was to raise your issue with Larian, then I'm afraid this post will do bupkis.
You might have luck actually addressing Larian directly:
The term was created by people influenced by american fringe ideology, how odd that it was indeed invented in Puerto Rico, currently american. To my knowledge it does not resonate well with hispanophones outside of the anglosaxon world.
No, it is not about gender or sexuality. I thought I made it crystal clear. Langage inclusif uses rules completely inexistent in the French language and tries to amalgamate itself with some legit French (e.g., "épicène" words) to try and sound "normal.".
It is the expression of an extreme political opinion, and it's making things harder to read.
That forum is called "Suggestions and Feedback." I assume it is read from time to time by both players and staff. The staff will read it once every week, and the more "hotter" discussions will be taken somewhat into consideration.
TBC, I have 0 expectations that Larian will do anything about it. Their subs are objectively improper French, most French people will be confused by it when seeing these sentences, and it kind of implies that French is a sexist language. They are objectively in the wrong. I understand, though, that people are somewhat reluctant to admit when they are in the wrong, and companies even more so. Realistically, it will probably be waived off as some far-right crazy take or something.
If they do something about it, the very tolerant crowd that has sprouted over the past few years in the DnD community or gaming journalism will tear them a new one. From Larian's point of view, it may look like a lot of hassle. What's more, they can still say that, although incorrect, it is morally right to use that language because some people say "talking like this is now morally better." Newsflash, it is not. It does not "fix" the things it claims it fixes in society, and we are still believing in 2024 that the language you speak, specifically your choice of vocabulary and grammar, will have an impact on society at large. This is the stuff of astromancy.
What is valuable to me is that players can also read these discussions. When they play and read this type of language used in subs, perhaps get annoyed; they might think "Hey, perhaps someone is thinking like me, and I'm not crazy". They might look at the forums and see one, perhaps a few more topics like this. Maybe want to create another one too or add a comment. And with time, if these messages accumulate over the years, it will become a topic of conversation more commonly spoken against in gaming.
For those who do not understand my grief with this. Imagine, you are going to the cinema to watch a French movie with subs (you are one hell of a masochist are you?) and the subs are written in Ebonics. Wouldn't you be confused? Are you not entitled to have your subs in "standard" English, regardless of your background?
Translation: "Puerto Ricans aren't real Latins!"
I suppose Wallonians aren't true Francophones either? Or did you forget BG3 was made by a Belgian company?
Look bro, I'm sorry that your native language is so primitive that the concept of genders outside of the artificial binary is confusing to it but maybe instead of pretending third-or-more genders don't exist and deliberately misgendering people out of some gross nationalistic pride or whatever perhaps you shoulder expand your language to include new grammar and terminology in order to address this very real concept which exists in practice?
Because right now you're basically complaining that your language doesn't have a word for "rain" and that attempts to circumvent this obvious issue are a 'corruption' of your language by 'foreign influences' and other xenophobic dogwhistles. Maybe go harass your language's big linguistics nerds and have them work that out instead of stalking a video game forum to preach jingoistic drivel.
In any case, pretending that English (the product of grossly simplified and crossbred mix of Latin, Germanic, and Gaelic tongues) is some kind of "advanced" language when its speakers have difficulty learning and using any of the "primitive" ones is not winning any favours.
Would you cancel a theoretical alien civilization if its language(s) only recognize gender binary then?
But the simple fact of this matter is that French, Spanish, and all the other gendered languages are working expressly on two extremely illogical premises:
1. That everything - even inanimate objects - have to have a gender.
2. That there are only two genders.
Neither of which is true. You are free to criticize attempts to break from the binary for being awful. Is Latinx terrible? Yes, because it doesn't make sense in Spanish. An often proposed alternative which is more in line with Spanish grammar is "Latine"; this is an example of CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM.
The opening post of this thread? Yeah, that's not constructive criticism - it's just prejudice. The core of OP's critique isn't that the gender neutral labels Larian introduced make no sense in French. If it was they would have stopped there, or would have suggested a better alternative for the goal in mind, or would have encouraged Larian to find a better alternative themselves.
Instead OP chose to point fingers at an ebul foreign menace without acknowledging the existence of people outside the binary at all. The message here is that French is perfectly fine as is, that non-binary people can take a hike, and that anyone who disagrees is some kind of foreign imperialist who hates the French language/culture/whatever.
Never mind that languages tend to have grammatical components which contribute to which gender a particular world is associated with, that myths regarding some cultures having a "third gender" stem from attempting to plaster the post-modern perception onto the cultural backgrounds without learning the specifics of what that actually meant, and that there are, indeed, two genders.
Otherwise the whole "non-binary" concept wouldn't make sense, no? Since it implies the existence of a "binary". Basic logic.
Or whatever your excuse is.
It isn't disrespectful to any culture to point out that their language does not accommodate for the existence of an entire demographic and it's utterly bizarre that you think it is. Why do non-binary people deserve to have their entire existence ignored? To preserve some ridiculous and antique grammar rules? You realize that languages (and cultures for that matter) are supposed to change and evolve over time, and that this is what prevents them from dying? Or that they often require foreign influences to do so?
I have no disrespect for the French culture. I actually like the French language, even. But there are non-binary people who speak the French language natively; people who don't want to be placed into genders they don't identify with. As a transwoman I empathize with that. The French language should obviously account for the existence of these people, and that it doesn't is an explicit flaw.
I don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about American culture. I hate American culture; it's repulsive. This has nothing to do with chauvinism and everything to do with inclusion.
Instead of figuring out as to why there's such an epidemic of people refusing to identify with their gender for whatever reason and seeing to fixing the root of the problem, it's spreading out of English-speaking countries into the rest of the world where impressionate teens and troubled adults are picking the new hot trend and trying to out-pronoun one another because apparently slapping a label on yourself is a suitable replacement for a personality or some tangible accomplishments in life that actually make you "special"(tm).
First world problems should be the least of an average person's worries.
Good to know your opinion is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and not worth listening to.
Listen bud, it seems like you sure have a lot of opinions about many many things and I'm certain your nanny loves listening to them, but as much as I would love to waste hours of my life debating your opinions with basic facts, it is not the purpose of this topic.
It is about asking for correct subs for the customers regardless of your personnal beliefs. It is funny you indeed tried to derail the conversation into some sort of racist nazi thing though.
Would langage inclusif be correct, taught in school and commonly understood by the population, this topic would not exist.
Regarding puerto rico, you don't need a translation. Were you not suffocating into your ideology you would have noticed that I'm sarcastically pointing out a correlation between the emergence of the term latinx with the fact that it came from a territory in the direct sphere of american influence.
To my very poor understanding of spanish, the spanish language is regulated by an organisation akin to the Academie Française in Spain, not by puerto rican activists. And the "standard" spanish is the one taught in school to foreign learners and pupils around the world. It would absolutely make sense to have subs reflecting the differences in a piece of entertainment in vocabulary, culture and language if the context allows for it but we both know that what you are arguing for is not culture representation but ideology.
Anyway, prop up to the guy who took the time to reply to his magma, what a madlad.