Baldur's Gate 3
Chris Perkins on 2024 DMG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzU2w5eDUMU

A deep dive with Chris Perkins into the new DMG.

12:30 - Really good stuff on DM'ing in general
At 18:00 - 'It's 5th edition. - It will all work with 5th edition.' It's NOT a new edition like many in the community are proclaiming.
20:50 - Monster manual - Getting bigger. Reorganized. Talks about CR. Possibly biggest ever?

PHB/MM/DMG all getting released at the same time.
Отредактировано Popsicles; 18 апр. 2023 г. в 19:02
< >
Сообщения 1630 из 36
Автор сообщения: Tech-Priest
Honestly they need to scrap 5e, and move on to a 6e.
Because the 5e rules system is really just far too simple to be interesting.
- Armor doesn't feel like armor, just an arbitrary dice roll.
- Magic doesn't feel like magic, as it lacks so much of what made 3.5e magic amazing. It was more than just damage, it was actually useful and really unique depending on your school of magic.
- 5e encourages Min-Maxing over building characters with flaws, due to the enemy designs and abilities being focused on excelling in one stat.

Couldn't disagree with you more.

Armour has always worked this way, sure 1E & 2E used THAC0 rather than the current system, but other than how it is calculated, it is essentially identical. 5E actually has a feat which makes armour absorb some of the damage, it doesn't scale at all, and is a bit rubbish past the first couple of levels, but it is there.

Magic is much more flexible in 5E because you don't have to learn four fireballs to cast four fireballs, so you can have a much better range. Now I will grant you that you get less spells because school specialisation doesn't give extra spells and nor do you get bonus spells from having a high attribute. There are also rituals which allow you to cast for free if you have the time. I do think they were too stingy on what is and what is not a ritual, but meh...

3.5E (and 3E) both had horrific min/maxing, search for Pun Pun the Kobold if you don't believe me, now that was some seriously head boggling min/maxing.

5E has problems (oh so many problems), but if someone asked me to play 1,2 or 3E D&D it would take a great deal of whining to get me to.
Автор сообщения: Tech-Priest
Автор сообщения: Yojo0o

When, in the history of DnD, has armor ever been more than an associated AC to roll against?

In what way is 5e Magic less interesting and inferior to 3.5e? It's largely the same, just with scaling differences. You act like utility spells were removed... they weren't, though?

On what planet was 3.5e not encouraging of min/max compared to 5e? For real? 5e is probably the least min/max-oriented DnD system to date. 3.5e had legendary stat bloat to build towards, and 2e basically required you to max out your primary stats before receiving any benefit (Good luck playing a warrior with 14-17 strength in BG1 or BG2!). 5e provides measured, incremental bonuses for positive character build decisions, and the penalty for not min/maxing is the same: a measured, incremental drop in power.

Play a game other than D&D and you will see how well an armor system can be done. It would require the damage system to be entirely re-designed, as most the issues with balancing in D&D stem from the dice bloat.

You can't have an armor system when damage can total into the 100's. If D&D moved from adding dice to a static modifier to damage, where growth is scaled in +1 to +10 Damage instead of +1 to +10 d6's, d8's, d10's, or d12 Damage Dice. You could end up with a situation where armor could be a real thing, because reducing damage would be impactful.

So your problem isn't with 5e, it's with DnD. You didn't indicate that.
Right now I don’t care what Perkins or anyone else at WotC has to say. Not after the OGL, and especially not after sending Pinkertons to a YouTubers house over magic the gathering cards.
Автор сообщения: Yojo0o
When, in the history of DnD, has armor ever been more than an associated AC to roll against?

In what way is 5e Magic less interesting and inferior to 3.5e? It's largely the same, just with scaling differences. You act like utility spells were removed... they weren't, though?

On what planet was 3.5e not encouraging of min/max compared to 5e? For real? 5e is probably the least min/max-oriented DnD system to date. 3.5e had legendary stat bloat to build towards, and 2e basically required you to max out your primary stats before receiving any benefit (Good luck playing a warrior with 14-17 strength in BG1 or BG2!). 5e provides measured, incremental bonuses for positive character build decisions, and the penalty for not min/maxing is the same: a measured, incremental drop in power.

+1. The best thing 3.5 ever did was spawn Pathfinder.




Автор сообщения: Tech-Priest
You can't have an armor system when damage can total into the 100's. If D&D moved from adding dice to a static modifier to damage, where growth is scaled in +1 to +10 Damage instead of +1 to +10 d6's, d8's, d10's, or d12 Damage Dice. You could end up with a situation where armor could be a real thing, because reducing damage would be impactful.


Armor in D&D does reduce damage, though, by increasing your chance of not getting hit. Sure sure, that's not what you mean, but it does functionally reduce the damage you're going to take in a fight, and the AC system does a fair enough job of abstracting either being dodgy as heck or equipped like an M1A1 tank, in a straightforward manner.

Compare that to WoD, where dodging and tanking hits are divided into two systems, and both are pointless in the face of a combat optimised character.

Other systems, like Shadowrun, Exalted, L5R, Scion all have systems that are either non factors like WoD, or add complexity to already complex games. Maybe some people like that complexity, but DnD has clearly gone for a streamlined system in 5e, so AC fills its function no worse or better, really, than a multitude of other systems, without breaking the requirement of not being complex.
Отредактировано sevensided; 26 апр. 2023 г. в 19:45
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master
Right now I don’t care what Perkins or anyone else at WotC has to say. Not after the OGL, and especially not after sending Pinkertons to a YouTubers house over magic the gathering cards.

Yes, it's obvious you'd rather listen to low-rent YouTubers rant about Wotc. Pinkertons sent to recover illegal possession of unreleased Magic cards. Wow. A company protecting it's IP.
Автор сообщения: Balltin
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master
Right now I don’t care what Perkins or anyone else at WotC has to say. Not after the OGL, and especially not after sending Pinkertons to a YouTubers house over magic the gathering cards.

Yes, it's obvious you'd rather listen to low-rent YouTubers rant about Wotc. Pinkertons sent to recover illegal possession of unreleased Magic cards. Wow. A company protecting it's IP.

No, I listen to reality, and some things are just beyond the pale that should not be ignored and/or defended. Such as criminal behavior.
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master
Автор сообщения: Balltin

Yes, it's obvious you'd rather listen to low-rent YouTubers rant about Wotc. Pinkertons sent to recover illegal possession of unreleased Magic cards. Wow. A company protecting it's IP.

No, I listen to reality, and some things are just beyond the pale that should not be ignored and/or defended. Such as criminal behavior.

Criminal like broadcasting a company's IP before release?
Автор сообщения: Balltin
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master

No, I listen to reality, and some things are just beyond the pale that should not be ignored and/or defended. Such as criminal behavior.

Criminal like broadcasting a company's IP before release?

That's not illegal since the YouTuber in question never signed anything, bought the cards legitimately and was not part of the embargo at all. The YouTuber did everything legitimately.

Sending the Pinkertons to intimidate him and attempting to break into his house and threatening his wife is blatantly criminal and I find it utterly baffling that you think that that is an acceptable chain of events in response to a missed phone call.
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master
Автор сообщения: Balltin

Criminal like broadcasting a company's IP before release?

That's not illegal since the YouTuber in question never signed anything, bought the cards legitimately and was not part of the embargo at all. The YouTuber did everything legitimately.

Sending the Pinkertons to intimidate him and attempting to break into his house and threatening his wife is blatantly criminal and I find it utterly baffling that you think that that is an acceptable chain of events in response to a missed phone call.

Again, you are going solely on the word of a 'YouTuber.' He is technically savvy... where is the Ring recording or video evidence of this being the actual case?

Or do you just believe everything you read?

It was not legally obtained. The shipper sent it by mistake. He had no right to broadcast the cards before release.
Автор сообщения: Balltin
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master

That's not illegal since the YouTuber in question never signed anything, bought the cards legitimately and was not part of the embargo at all. The YouTuber did everything legitimately.

Sending the Pinkertons to intimidate him and attempting to break into his house and threatening his wife is blatantly criminal and I find it utterly baffling that you think that that is an acceptable chain of events in response to a missed phone call.

Again, you are going solely on the word of a 'YouTuber.' He is technically savvy... where is the Ring recording or video evidence of this being the actual case?

Or do you just believe everything you read?

It was not legally obtained. The shipper sent it by mistake. He had no right to broadcast the cards before release.

Regardless of the respective legality, it's very concerning that you're much more inclined to demonize a private citizen hoping for a scoop, but entirely okay with major corporations sending a private merc group after them. Is that something you want corporations to be able to do? That's some dystopian ♥♥♥♥.
Автор сообщения: Balltin
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master

That's not illegal since the YouTuber in question never signed anything, bought the cards legitimately and was not part of the embargo at all. The YouTuber did everything legitimately.

Sending the Pinkertons to intimidate him and attempting to break into his house and threatening his wife is blatantly criminal and I find it utterly baffling that you think that that is an acceptable chain of events in response to a missed phone call.

Again, you are going solely on the word of a 'YouTuber.' He is technically savvy... where is the Ring recording or video evidence of this being the actual case?

Or do you just believe everything you read?

It was not legally obtained. The shipper sent it by mistake. He had no right to broadcast the cards before release.

And you are taking the word of a big business with way too much power and no scruples, as proven by the OGL debacle that happened only a few months ago, and defending them from blatant criminal behavior to the point you are trying to blame the victim for the crime.

You are defending sending thugs to threaten a man's wife and him over cards that were about to be released a week later.

Let's say you received a product and started showing it off and I was the maker of that product and found out about it. You bought the product legitimately and somewhere in my supply chain someone messed up and sent them to you early. I give you a phone call, you don't recognize the call so you don't answer it. Am I in my rights to hire the Pinkertons to go to your house and threaten you and your family, then? After all, I'm only defending my IP and my brand, right?
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master
Автор сообщения: Balltin

Again, you are going solely on the word of a 'YouTuber.' He is technically savvy... where is the Ring recording or video evidence of this being the actual case?

Or do you just believe everything you read?

It was not legally obtained. The shipper sent it by mistake. He had no right to broadcast the cards before release.

And you are taking the word of a big business with way too much power and no scruples, as proven by the OGL debacle that happened only a few months ago, and defending them from blatant criminal behavior to the point you are trying to blame the victim for the crime.

You are defending sending thugs to threaten a man's wife and him over cards that were about to be released a week later.

Let's say you received a product and started showing it off and I was the maker of that product and found out about it. You bought the product legitimately and somewhere in my supply chain someone messed up and sent them to you early. I give you a phone call, you don't recognize the call so you don't answer it. Am I in my rights to hire the Pinkertons to go to your house and threaten you and your family, then? After all, I'm only defending my IP and my brand, right?

I would never dream of broadcasting someone's intellectual product before release. He knew what he was doing. He knew he was breaking copyright.

I could give two ♥♥♥♥♥ about the OGL. Just like 98% of D&D players.

Keep arguing in hypotheticals. I'll wait for more info or evidence.

It's pretty D&D to send some thugs to one's house no?
Автор сообщения: Balltin
Автор сообщения: Dragon Master

And you are taking the word of a big business with way too much power and no scruples, as proven by the OGL debacle that happened only a few months ago, and defending them from blatant criminal behavior to the point you are trying to blame the victim for the crime.

You are defending sending thugs to threaten a man's wife and him over cards that were about to be released a week later.

Let's say you received a product and started showing it off and I was the maker of that product and found out about it. You bought the product legitimately and somewhere in my supply chain someone messed up and sent them to you early. I give you a phone call, you don't recognize the call so you don't answer it. Am I in my rights to hire the Pinkertons to go to your house and threaten you and your family, then? After all, I'm only defending my IP and my brand, right?

I would never dream of broadcasting someone's intellectual product before release. He knew what he was doing. He knew he was breaking copyright.

I could give two ♥♥♥♥♥ about the OGL. Just like 98% of D&D players.

Keep arguing in hypotheticals. I'll wait for more info or evidence.

It's pretty D&D to send some thugs to one's house no?

The broadcasting was not an issue because it wasn't illegal. There are steps to be taken before sending Pinkertons.

A phone call initially, yes, and you can expect they wouldn't answer it if they don't recognize the phone number. Happens all the time. Contact YouTube with a copyright strike and have the videos taken down that way. Send a representative to the YouTuber and make a deal with them to use them in an ad campaign and ask them to take the videos down until then.

Or, just deal with it and crack down on the supply chain and find out where and who made the mistake of sending the cards early and just chalk it up for a loss and call it free advertising.

Any of those things would be far preferable than sending the Pinkertons to his house, an organization well-known and rather infamous as being thugs to the point that they are the villains in other video games like Red Dead Redemption, and 100% justifiably seen as villains based on their historic actions, such as violently union-busting for the corporations in the 1800's.

Even if things didn't go as is being reported, the very act of sending the Pinkertons in and of itself is intimidation, and is way too far for what boils down to a deck of magic cards.
I'm bowing out. I'm going on vacation with my family. You all enjoy fuming over the evil empire.

I could care less if this was intimidating to this YouTuber. He tried to profit of an unreleased IP worth millions of dollars. Big corps protect their IPs. Quit being idealistic about this situation.
Автор сообщения: Yojo0o
Автор сообщения: Balltin

Again, you are going solely on the word of a 'YouTuber.' He is technically savvy... where is the Ring recording or video evidence of this being the actual case?

Or do you just believe everything you read?

It was not legally obtained. The shipper sent it by mistake. He had no right to broadcast the cards before release.

Regardless of the respective legality, it's very concerning that you're much more inclined to demonize a private citizen hoping for a scoop, but entirely okay with major corporations sending a private merc group after them. Is that something you want corporations to be able to do? That's some dystopian ♥♥♥♥.

Heck, this is Cyberpunk level of dystopia.
< >
Сообщения 1630 из 36
Показывать на странице: 1530 50

Дата создания: 18 апр. 2023 г. в 19:01
Сообщений: 35