Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Here comes someone who'll say otherwise or cheer you on, and go on go on.... And nothing will change, it's not like anyone is gonna change opinions.
yes conversations are conversations and not reality warping powers. Very smart would you like a cookie for figuring that out?
(That means it's better than OP's "review".)
Why ,you want to follow my preferences on the internet?
That is, what I like. Other people can play smaller games, I prefer something like this.
Commas: The review could benefit from more appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and items in a list.
Periods: The author should use periods at the end of sentences consistently. There are instances where periods are missing, like in the sentence, "I cant really recommend," which should be "I can't really recommend."
Sentence Structure: Some sentences in the review are quite long and could be divided into shorter, more concise sentences to improve readability.
The review the OP provided does contain some vulgar language, specifically when the reviewer mentions that the companions in the game "felt horny" and refers to them as "an option to **** if I wanted to." The use of such explicit language may not be suitable for all audiences and can affect the tone and professionalism of the review.
It's important for reviewers to use appropriate and respectful language when expressing their opinions, especially in a public or shared context. While it's okay to provide honest feedback, it's generally more constructive and respectful to describe aspects of a game or any other subject using clear and non-offensive language.
Using vulgar language can detract from the review's overall credibility and may make it less accessible to a wider audience. Constructive criticism and feedback can be effectively communicated without resorting to explicit or offensive terms.
I give the review a 5/10, Very Average, Not Even Good.
Philogosten once again criticizing people while exhibiting his or her inability to write at even the grade school level. Your presentation denudes your statement of persuasive force. Maybe you are a savant? A brilliant intellect but haven't figured out how to use commas? Or to capitalize?
Maybe someone will give you a cookie someday for learning how to write?
Double dipping into satire and serious discussion just comes off as cringe. Pick one and stop trying so hard.
So, I understand not liking the story or the characters. Different strokes for different folks. But bland? Absolutely not. BF and I have been discussing the characters for over a month now because of how much depth there is there.