Bestiality? really?

[wetlander]

Was watching someone play this then suddenly he did the whole bestiality scene. really? Whoever made this game should be arrested.

[Adam__86]

Publicado originalmente por kgmi:

Publicado originalmente por Faolchu:

Nobody cares about your book of lies from your religion of lies. That God is a failure anyway. Created to enslave new age hippies.

EHm, yes people do care, all the followers of the abrahamic religions, especially muslims and their death penalties for this kinda stuff

I mean RL and fiction are different

Beastiality is illegal
Shapeshifting people don't exist therefore no law/rules. I imagine if said existed it would be legal assuming consensual.

Laws based on religions need abolishing

[Adam__86]

Publicado originalmente por kgmi:

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

Some God, can't even control his creations

Cuz he gave free will, to be a bigot, to be homophobic, to partake in homosexual acts, bear sex and ofc trolling this forum.
You couldnt partake in your homosexual acts IRL if he would assert control

Convenient counter to HE DOESN'T EXIST

[meleander]

Publicado originalmente por wetlander:

Was watching someone play this then suddenly he did the whole bestiality scene. really? Whoever made this game should be arrested.

So if your wife or gf (assuming you have any) would grab a schoolgirl shirt then would you be a pedophile?

[Adam__86]

Also why follow a god that created cancer? Numerous horrendous diseases and conditions? Allows children to be molested. Let's war occur in his name. The free will argument only goes so far until it begins looking more likely he doesn't give two craps and moved onto another project

[RasaNova]

Publicado originalmente por solaris32:

Publicado originalmente por id795078477:

Haha.. OP, just wait till the army of conformants will show you incredible agility in exercising mental gymnastics about how it is ok ;)

To all those telling - hey, it's a druid so it's fine, I always reply: there's "disguise self" spell in-lore and in the game. So why don't we "disguise self" as a tiefling kid (who's also in-game) and have some "dubious activities"? Nah? Crossing the line? But what's the difference, it's still an adult who's disguising self!

Technically that wouldn't be wrong, any more than adult women wearing school girl outfits is wrong. But it would be incredibly creepy and I wouldn't want to be with anyone who wanted to do it.

And you thought you had a good argument lol.

Yeah it's a terrible argument, unfortunately it's all they really have.

[kgmi]

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

Also why follow a god that created cancer? Numerous horrendous diseases and conditions? Allows children to be molested. Let's war occur in his name. The free will argument only goes so far until it begins looking more likely he doesn't give two craps and moved onto another project

The answer is kinda simple, you know when a developer abandons a failed game?
When he saw how people defended bestiality in Sodom and Gomorrah, he just abandoned the project and restarted on a different planet.

[Adam__86]

Publicado originalmente por RasaNova:

Publicado originalmente por solaris32:

Technically that wouldn't be wrong, any more than adult women wearing school girl outfits is wrong. But it would be incredibly creepy and I wouldn't want to be with anyone who wanted to do it.

And you thought you had a good argument lol.

Yeah it's a terrible argument, unfortunately it's all they really have.

I mean a lot of straight guys get hot over Japanese schoolgirls

[kgmi]

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

Publicado originalmente por RasaNova:

Yeah it's a terrible argument, unfortunately it's all they really have.

I mean a lot of straight guys get hot over Japanese schoolgirls

You are allowed to get hot over Japanese schoolboys too, dw i wont judge

[Adam__86]

Publicado originalmente por kgmi:

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

Also why follow a god that created cancer? Numerous horrendous diseases and conditions? Allows children to be molested. Let's war occur in his name. The free will argument only goes so far until it begins looking more likely he doesn't give two craps and moved onto another project

The answer is kinda simple, you know when a developer abandons a failed game?
When he saw how people defended bestiality in Sodom and Gomorrah, he just abandoned the project and restarted on a different planet.

But if he created us he created our brain thus our desires. Why create brains that randomly seek out such things. So either you believe god is incompetent or uncaring

[Agony_Aunt]

Publicado originalmente por kgmi:

Publicado originalmente por Orion Invictus:

Is a Druid shapeshifted into a bear the same as a bear, or is he still a Druid?

Food for thought.

Once there were 2 cities, called Sodom and Gomorrah, they were inhabited by druids having ravaging, shapeshifted bear sex with other people every day. They tried to normalise beastiality until 1 day, god saw that such wickedness can no longer be tolerated on his holy earth.

You know how the story ended

God polymorphed into a bear?

[Adam__86]

Publicado originalmente por kgmi:

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

I mean a lot of straight guys get hot over Japanese schoolgirls

You are allowed to get hot over Japanese schoolboys too, dw i wont judge

I genuinely don't know many men that are tbh. Its usually women that swoon over that.

[Agony_Aunt]

Publicado originalmente por Papa Goose:

What if you both were shape-shifted into bears? Is it still bestiality?

Asking the cromulent questions!

What if one wildshapes into a bear and another into a duck?

[navigator4223]

Simple answer for OP:

No.

See? :-)

[RasaNova]

Publicado originalmente por Adam__86:

Publicado originalmente por Faolchu:

Nobody cares about your book of lies from your religion of lies. That God is a failure anyway. Created to enslave new age hippies.

Some God, can't even control his creations

Just curious - when Zeus took the form of a beast to hook up with mortal women, was it bestiality, or just making legends?

[Estevan Valladares]

People are upset because it is Hasin.
I bet everyone would be cheering if it was Jaheera poucing someone's tadpole.

And for all the religious sods talking, you should know that in "biblical times", they would not mind about the bestiality aspect of things. You were not to have intercourse with MALE beasts only.
You can check that out in the works of a whole lot of even biblical scholars themselves.
And their problem was not even with animals precisely, but the fact that in those times, there was a distinction between slaves and thralls. I think northfolk from Anglo-American vernacular call thralls serfs, but no matter.
Slaves were considered animals, and therefore the actual condemnation of intercourse with MALE beasts was meant to cull the practice of masters laying with their male slaves.
Serfs were the ones put in to, well, serfdom, because of crimes or debt, which were for all intents, still "humans", but in a situation of serfdom. Slaves were the ones who were considered animals, and property of someone.

No one, for the most part, since humanity has records of it, has cared about humans being "top" over animals, ever.

Goes to show how much bible zealotry knows about their own.