Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's pretty much the only reason.
Not that this specific weapon needs any help at all.
trident isn't one of those
5
5
5
5
5
5
You lot would still be over here defending 5e. Ugh.
True but this isn't a DnD nerd answer but a HEMA nerd answer.
OP clearly states they wants a DnD nerd answer so not a HEMA one.
Sorry, Larian is following DnD ruleset in this:
"While you are wielding a glaive, halberd, pike, quarterstaff, or spear, other creatures provoke an opportunity attack from you when they enter the reach you have with that weapon."
More like DM didn't know what they were doing or what to home-brew so they just picked ♥♥♥♥ willy-nilly and left some ♥♥♥♥ in the gutter while breaking others and still making some OP and so on and so forth...
tridents, however, tend to universally be a poke focused tool.
like it or leave it looking at the list of weapons they pick, a lot of them can be used to swing around
In my campaign spears and tridents aren't polearms as they're both just long shafted stabbing .weqpons whereas polearms should have blunt and piercing strike capability. Pikes are fringe, so are quarterstaffs. But this is HEMA territory and boy does DnD get things historically wrong 🙃