Sourcebook representation?

[D Blu J]

I'm prepated to assume since this works on a modified D&D 5e ruleset, that the PHB is fully represented in this game. What about other sourcebooks like Tasha's Cauldron and Xanathar's Guide to Everything? Especially in regards to available spells, since I love a lot of the spells like Ice Knife and such that the other sourcebooks added.

[Makkura]

When you say "represented", does this include "adhering to"?

[D Blu J]

Originally posted by Makkura:

When you say "represented", does this include "adhering to"?

Not exactly sure what the distinction is, but I'm mostly asking in reference to spell lists tbh.

[Murderhobo]

Originally posted by D Blu J:

I'm prepated to assume since this works on a modified D&D 5e ruleset, that the PHB is fully represented in this game. What about other sourcebooks like Tasha's Cauldron and Xanathar's Guide to Everything? Especially in regards to available spells, since I love a lot of the spells like Ice Knife and such that the other sourcebooks added.

No, you have a little of Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes, a little of Descent into Avernus and a ton of lore from previous editions.

Some spells are more useful here than in TT (Spiritual Weapon) but in general if you play mostly with the PHB (and the DM Guide for stuff like Oathbreakers) you'd be doing roughly the same.

As for Spells lists, I haven't noticed anythign that isn't in the PHB.

[Notebook]

Some of the Tasha's/XGtE spells are included, Ice Knife being one of them actually.

https://baldursgate3.wiki.fextralife.com/Spells (I'm pretty sure this has the full spell list)

Not all spells are a 1:1 recreation of their original 5e version though. Usually there are changes to duration.