Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Long-winded post to say. "I just didn't like it," followed by a lot of fluff trying to validate your reasons, presented less like opinion and more like facts, which will make people with differing opinions lash out at what they think reads like facts.
Present it as opinion and people will just move on with their lives. Present it as fact and you have 7 pages of comments why you're wrong.
Someone this invested on steam, with 80 lvl profile and over 200 games, suddenly buys primary block buster title on GOG, yeah sure. 🤡🤡🤡
I loved BG1 and BG2. BG2 was probably my favorite game of all time. I had probably every bit of 500 hours in that game playing like 5-7 runs all the way through. I bought the enhanced edition on Steam and Beamdog, including SoD. I even bought the game for more than a few of my friends and we played multiplayer with all of its myriad of flaws. I have over 500 hours of BG1 EE on steam as of right now.
That being Said, all these people hating on the turn-based are nuts. I very much enjoy BG3. Much less cheesing of the game like there was in BG1 and BG2. (not to say you can't still do some cheese but still)
Those saying the story sucks, I disagree. Is it as good a story as BG2 was? I don't think so, but it doesn't have to be.
Graphically it is good. Not the best graphics of all time but good. The setting and lore stuff is all there. This feels like Faerun to me.
Is it exactly Baldur's Gate 2 with better graphics and a better version of the same engine and game mechanics? No, but it never had to be. It's been over 20 years. I don't understand why people are expecting the same thing, just because its named BG3. Many games do this where they change the playstyle or the engine that the game originally had. There are many references to the events of BG1 and BG2. There are even call backs to some characters some of which make appearances.
To all the naysayers this game is Baldur's Gate 3.... it's not Baldur's Gate 1 its not Baldur's Gate 2... if you want a Baldur's Gate 3 that is whatever you think it should be then go make that game.
"Visually, Baldur's Gate 3 fails to impress. In an era where stunning graphics are the norm, this game's visuals are a throwback to a bygone era. The character models lack the detail and nuance seen in other contemporary RPGs, and the environments feel uninspired and bland."
Compared to ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ what? Seriously? Compared to what? This is easily 90% better than every other game I've played. Defend this statement. What other games have better graphics than it? Seriously?
Did you ever talk to the peoble? Arriving at the Inn in act 2 was a masterpiece of storrytelling!
Maybe you don't like 5e rules? For me Solasta and BG3 made a perfect 5e fighting simulation! Normally I dont like turn based CRPG, but I love it in both games, because they're doing a perfect job!