安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Also BG3 is already out in EA for while they sold 2.5 millions copies during EA.
875K concurrent players as record for BG3 seems 6million is even low(look at Hogwarts or Elden Ring who sold very quickly over 10 million.
Baldur's Gate 3 is claimed to have sold 6 mil copies on steam and their playerbase is over 800k at peak.
they have stupid shooters or something whatever they doing on so box.
Let's say Bill is on this forum and talking about food.
I say: "Bill likes cheese so much they don't eat anything else."
Bill won't be able to disprove my statement. Bill could say "I eat things that aren't cheese!" and that would not be proof.
And you say: "No one has proven Samvega wrong yet, interesting."
Lesson: Just as a lack of proof does not make something false, a lack of disproof does not make something true.
The OP is making an assertion, it's up to them to provide proof. There is nothing in player numbers that suggests the figure is false.
Awful analogy. If bill denies your claim, that's the closest we'll ever get to the truth so it stands to reason to believe him or at least consider it.
Similarly, if larion showed us some actual statistics, or someone made a claim that undeniably leads to 6m+, then we'd have no choice but to believe it.
So far we have only conjectures, so OP hasn't been proven wrong and can be proven wrong.
I'm sorry, critical thinking is sorely missing ion 2023. If they've already had close to 900K playing simultaneously on Steam alone (not even factoring in GoG), then only selling 1+ million TOTAL is a silly notion. That would mean that 85-ish% of ALL the game owners would be playing at the same time, across the entire globe with different day/night cycles and work hours, lol. In general, 15% of game owners are playing at any given time based on numbers from previous hits. For example, Elden Ring had sold 12 million but only had 1 million playing concurrently early on.
seems subpar even.
Sort of like how Diablo IV is subpar. 😁 I bought it...not a fan so far. Loved 2 and 3.
The person who's post you copy-pasted was making a completely different point than your claim that "EA players were baited and switched" so including that here is a non-sequitur.
"Injection of ideology is a lot heavier" is a loaded statement. if you're able to re-state your argument in a more neutral and informative way that would be helpful. If I was to read into the statement as is, it sounds like you're alluding to some weird beliefs about LGBT stuff in the game. I would point out that a female Tav could romance Shadowheart or Minthara as easily as a male Tav in EA. The final product being "heavier" with 'ideology' is simply a product of the final game being "heavier" with the main story and companion stories, but you can't pretend that that wasn't present in EA. Of course, if you haven't actually played the EA or final release you wouldn't know that.
Calling LGBT representation in art an 'ideology' is an interesting take. I guess you would consider art that represents a nuclear family to be 'ideological' as well? Because straight relationships are only right wing and gay relationships are only left wing? Living and letting live is not an option? Seems like that would be the moderate take at least.
https://vginsights.com/game/1086940