Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
;)
Personally, I think that label could be applied depending on your definition. This is coming from someone who has followed the various Forgotten Realms lore for many years and I can tell you that some of the things you see in BG3 would not have fit in the original lore.
1. Racial Diversity: as a mostly medieval European setting (but one that has magic that can aid travel although not on a mass scale), the original Realms that was focused on in the novels and games was pretty white. Which, getting the historical inspiration and lack of mass travel would make sense.
Sure, some place cosmopolitan and magic rich like the city of Baldurs Gate would have a better chance of greater diversity both ethnically but also non-humans. But the former I would suspect would be more visitors. That Wyll's dark skin father is a Duke with prominence seems unlikely... yet that is a position he could have earned through merit and adventure (a common trope in fantasy).
The racial diversity among the humans and even non-humans you see in the game is a recent retcon compared to what came before and thus might seem "woke."
2. LGBTQ+ representation: The Realms has never featured many LGBTQ+ couples, at least until relatively recently. You might see some of that in the drow societies but that is a decadent with strict gender roles/misandry under the thumb of an evil goddess so... not really the best representation
As a society that would be mostly agrarian, homosexuality would be looked down upon due to the need of labor. Magic of a positive manner doesn't really filter down to the common folk so you need human labor instead.
Again, as a wealthy and cosmopolitian city, Baldurs Gate would be a little freer in this manner yet historically, this would indicate decadence and a society in decline.
3. Trans options in the character creator: you can mix and match genitals with a different body. Also, you can (I believe) give a voice to a body that would not normally be associated with said body (like a masculine voice with a feminine body)
Again, you would not see this in the normal lore. That said, I am not aware of trans characters in the game nor is there is big deal made.
ON THE OTHER HAND....
There isn't any lecturing or "lessons" that are taught. You can be as bad or good as you want without the game (as opposed to individual characters) telling you how evil you are for subscribing to a certain political view. Nor is any ethnic, gender, or sexuality presented as inherently good or bad.
In conclusions... I think there are some "woke" ideas and retcons in the lore but the game doesn't enslave itself to it. You aren't forced down the "right path" but have the freedom to blaze your own trail.
And, the game is just INCREDIBLE. So I would encourage you to play it.
Filthy creatures.
I mean, is it in somebody's contract this same dumb question must be asked over and over again, about once a week?
Long answer: Yes, it is.
Technically, the OP didn't say it is.
As for the question, I have no Idea. "Woke" has so many different definitions that I have no idea knowing which one is being used here.