Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Fun anecdote, but I remember one time when I was chatting with someone while I had BG3 up, I was randomly flitting through customization options while my friend was looking over my shoulder, and all of a sudden I hear "So, do they just not care how the guys look in this game or something?" Heh.
Your "throw in sliders" in reality means "employ completely different tech". Current tech they use is a fully pre-combined face mesh and "sliders" assume the possibility of partial face edits which is miles ahead of what they currently have.
Don't get me wrong, I am not defending them. If anything, I always strongly opposed their choice of outdated (by more than a decade) tech. Yet we have to see past emotions and into the reason. If they chose to do the cheap fully pre-combined mesh approach, it can mean one of two things (or both in some variety):
1. They don't care about how characters look. In this case - this topic's question has its answer right away.
2. They don't have the budget for more progressive tech. Because - while yes - it's somewhat a standard nowadays, it still requires an order of magnitude more work: sheer implementation, modelling, testing those sliders, designing the choices, seeing if it stylistically matches, you name it. In this case - my previous post applies.
This excuse is so lame. Look...just do you. Any justification just looks ridiculous.
3. Do what I finally did today: Install mods with better (in my opinion) faces.
Beauty varies from human to human and ANY human that says "looks don't matter" is either lying or lying to themselves. Anytime, someone has said this to me, all I have to do is point out various people until that person says "I don't find them attractive." Point is made. No human will ever find every human attractive.
I'm not saying use any standards of beauty. I'm saying give us more diverse faces or give us more control over shaping those faces.
Personally, I'd love good looking people no matter which gender.
I'm not saying more options is a bad thing, but the options given should be enough to make something people can live with. And on the extreme end, calling them ugly shows a particular break with the reality of how people look. The game isn't instagram.
And TBH, the standards of beauty aren't really variable- the minimum standards of beauty are variable.
Character creation is a REALLY, REALLY big thing in the gaming community.
The standards of beauty are FAR, FAR more variable than you think.
--------------------→ (My point)
|
|
|
|
|
↓
(You)
I love when dev's do that, you know... instead of allowing fantasy to exist in a fantasy world they just give ugly characters instead. (Heavy Sarcasm)
Well, some people forget the genres called Fantasy.
So personally I think characters should look the way the player wants, and what fits the archetype a npc should represent. Elves = beauty, Dwarves = Rugged, etc., etc.