RTX 2070 Super

[LightStar]

Just started the game with Graphics set to Ultra, using a Wide Screen Monitor (32"), game set at 3440x1440 at 144 Full Screen. Am getting about 60 FPS +/_ 5. With a little adjustment down on Graphics I could probably come out at 100 FPS. Game running good and looking great. Not sure if moving Frame Rate up minus adjusting Graphics down would be a Positive or Negative. Anyone got any thoughts on having a higher Frame Rate compared to better Graphics Settings? The RTX 2070 Super, for a slightly older card is still holding its own. Wonder how the NVIDIA 3000 and 4000 series are doing?

[The Real Revan]

I currently have a 2070 super as well. My 4070TI comes tomorrow so ill see how that goes after that.

[nyanko]

I don't see why you would need more than 60fps though. It's not a first person shooter. I actually play it with 30fps on my mac and I don't see the difference with my PC running much higher framerate.

[LightStar]

This is more of a question of sacrifice. Sacrifice Graphics over FPS or Sacrifice FPS over Graphics? And how much does FPS matter after 60FPS?

[Kyutaru]

I'd actually always sacrifice FPS in a turn-based game. Set the FPS cap to 36 for your 144hz monitor and it'll show 1/4 of the frames, smoother than 30 fps would be. The main things that impact how pretty the game is are the High Textures and Models followed by the Shadows followed by all the bloom and sharpness nonsense. Those last elements hit the performance the hardest so you are better off tanking your FPS (it's really not noticeable) and getting stellar graphics for the talky bits.

[boo_guy]

Originally posted by LightStar:

Wonder how the NVIDIA 3000 and 4000 series are doing?

My 4090 is hanging in there

I have it limited to 144fps which is mostly steady at 4k with basically everything at max.