Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Setting undead minions aside, how would anyone know?
There are some interesting reactions to the Warlocks imp right now...so presumably we might be getting something similar for undead.
Necromancy is not exactly outlawed unless its a very specific DnD world or certain group of people. There are even "good" necromancy spells that can keep alive target from dying, transfer health or preserve the body (for resurrection for example). Don't think your companions, unless super righteous, will be against you animating a corpse of a freshly killed bandit to help win the fight.
What I mean is that necromancy deals with death but not actually evil in itself. Now if you are just a baddie and use freshly dug zombies to eat villagers brains to get more zombies - I could see how you could get some cross looks.
I am talking tabletop example where everything is possible. In bg3 reaction to necromancy spells will probably be even more subtle if any.
But if you want summons and control undead stuff... best bet would be wizard, cleric. anyway to soon to talk about it cos we dont have all the needed info.
In the majority of Farünian cities Necromancers have a terrible reputation due to the bad apples. Guilt by association. Every peasant isn't going to evaluate you based on your merits and deeds, they're far more likely to grab their pitchforks and torches, or call the town guard.
Lots of cities outright forbid Necromancy.
Not only that, but Wizard specializations aren't known for being particularly powerful or useful, though ymmv depending on how you use them.
A Wizard from any School can be a Necromancer by taking Necromancy spells, although the Necromancer will have slightly more minions with a little more health.
But more hp isn't the only way to support your minions, or you may be into Necromancy for something other than minions. Also, one could argue that the Conjurer has better minions, and it's possible to get undead other than by raising them from corpses (it's even possible to summon undead directly from the Shadowfel instead of reanimating, using Conjuration magic).
The thing you have to ask yourself is, "What am I trying to accomplish, and what abilities do I need to do it?" It might turn out that your idea of an undead master is better as a different subclass or eve multiclass (Warlock/Cleric?)
Like the oathbreakers control undead spell, that doesn't let you control undead directly, it's horrible spell cos of that, AI just isnt good enough, not to mention it's not even half as fun as directly controling minions.
it's way more fun when you can directly control minions like the archers skeletons from Animate Dead spell or the hag Zombie. No clue what were they thinking giving control to AI without at least giving us optional direct control.
The spell isn't all that great already by itself cos all spells needs to compete vs fireball but that AI control just makes zombies meh...