Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
My understanding is also that it's decently heavy armor, making it unsuitable to fit the DnD mechanical niche that studded leather currently holds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R81KifekflQ
I mean, that's exactly the point.
Obversely, a highwayman could don studded leather and appear to be outfitted in brigandine which would give the illusion of a much sturdier set of armor.
While I don't see how this really impacts BG3, I could see DMs using this information to mislead a party into thinking an enemy appears to be in light armor when in actuality they are wearing medium armor. Cost wise this could be a game changer. Enemies outfitted in brigandine are likely to be better equipped and have access to better resources then enemies in studded leather.
Brigandine armor is, or was considered medium armor in D&D. Not sure if it was abandoned in later additions, but it used to be a separate option, so it isn't the same thing as studded leather in D&D.