Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Make him lose his lover to Mizora.
Canon wise RP wyll is a warlock and not a paladin or multiclass . So makes zero sense that someone binded by demonic pact can also swear an Oath as his pact boss can easily tell him to break it and he would be obligated to do so.
So again lore wise makes zero sense but gameplay wise it’s a very powerful combination and I enjoy using it.
In the end you have to chose to go by lore or by gameplay
Oath of Vengeance probably fits him best RPwise. I like the Oath of the Ancients mechanically but that one is admittedly harder to justify while he's a warlock.
Oath of the Ancients + Fey warlock, if the patron is Seelie, fits pretty well RPwise. But Wyll is stuck as a fiend warlock.
Making a fiend pact would certainly break Oath of the Ancients and Devotion. They could try to get out of the warlock pact but the above oaths don't really allow for him doing too much outside Lawful Good, so...
Oath of Vengeance works best. Vengeance against all those monsters who prey on the innocent. Fits how he turned to the hells to do the same, even if it's a much less clean power.
And with such loopholes Mizora could make him break his pact over and over as she pleases . So again no, RP wise makes zero sense for wyll to become a paladin.
Better to make a custom Tav in which case you can justify any class combinations for any reason as it’s non canon .
What it does mean though is that Wyll would have to walk a tightrope around both his fiend pact and paladin oath, and I expect Mizora would try to engineer a situation (like with Karlach) where Wyll would end up becoming an Oathbreaker. At that point, it's either break the pact and keep the oath, which will subject him to infernal consequences, or uphold the pact and break the Oath.
The question is of course, what the requirements are to become a paladin in the first place, and would having an active infernal pact invalidate it? I would admit if I were DMing, I wouldn't allow Oath of Devotion or Ancients to someone who's actively fiend pacted. Vengeance is a stretch too. I suppose it's in theory possible though?
Unless of course, he was a paladin first, then made the fiend pact, became an Oathbreaker, and is then an Oathbreaker/Warlock. Which certainly fits.
But I'm not sure if the Oathbreaker conditions apply to companions mechanically in BG3? I haven't tested that.
I do admit for a custom character Oath of the Ancients/Fey Warlock is probably the easiest combo to justify, especially if you say your Fey patron is one of the Seelie court.
But once he breaks the pact he is no longer a warlock .
So you could RP if you break the pact with Mizora to a pure paladin I guess which would make sense given Wylls personality and self righteousness.
But no way as both warlock and paladin at the same time , especially with someone like Mizora as his patron who will make his life a living hell and keep finding ways to force him to break his oath.
And RP wise wyll shouldn’t be so dumb as to swear an oath to anything knowing that his will isn’t his own and he is bounded by a legal pact
Here's the thing though, oath breaking needs to be done willingly. Having a contract and being forced to is going against his will, so it wouldn't break.
Wyll isn’t forced by a dominate person spell , he has the choise to disobey his contract and face consequences or break his oath - all based on free will.
Cant rp that after mizora he started to consume fiends power by killing under vengeance oath?
Like other games where warlock command not opposite
Disobeying can also lead to oath breaks as well. A devotion paladin says no but that can be seen as breaking the honor tenet. Same applies to the other oaths with their own scenario.
Mizora can test Wyll but at no point could she give him a choice that no matter what would force a break.
No, A warlock pact can be mutual, antagonistic or not even known by the patron that the warlock is tapping into their power. Just in Wyll's story he is a slave to Mizora via a contract.