Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In standard D&D5 and/or Solasta, Eldritch Knights get a class feature to be able to cast spells without a free hand too.
I would say that the Eldritch Knight subclass is still worth it thought for Weapon Bond for thrown weapons, Shield, and Misty Step. Take the Tavern Brawler Feat with the weapon bond and you have a ranged attack with 2x your STR mod to attack AND damage, which is very strong.
It's been too long since I played that but he's right, up until recently all spells had Verbal, Somatic, and Material elements, at least one. Something like Power Word: Stun you could use without gestures so you could use a 2h weapon and such, but others required you to have a hand free to cast, or both hands if it had somatic and material components.
DnD had those rules since the mid-1970s. Not sure when they took them out.
I don't recall arcane casters requiring a free hand to cast a spell in D&D, i.e. they could cast spells with somatic components with a two-handed staff equipped in earlier editions. Divine Casters needed to have a hand free for their holy symbol, although a shield with a holy symbol would suffice.