Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
the more character the party got, the scale toward the player will tip so much more. 4 characters is ideal party size or the game will have no challenge even in honor mode
No it wasn't.
Balancing and multiplayer. Think about that.
No. I'm going to reject that opinion. This game is easily 70 hours. I'm not going to keep replaying it to get the "full" experience. To be honest, having 6 members has been the most fulfilling experience thus far.
I understand that "balance" but the story in this type of game is far more important, plus, once again, nearly 6 characters just chillin' in your base while the world is crumbling is dumb. It isn't believable at all and totally breaks my immersion of this game.
It's fine everyone thinks balance is the most important thing but this is just coming from a person that values a complete experience more than. "Oh man, the balance though, in the game is super balanced around 4 players plus oh man, replayability!"
Not sure if anyone noticed but game is long. If it was short cool, but this game is incredibly long. There are a LOT of characters. If everyone is vouching for 4 players max, they should've removed two - three characters.