Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It feels like the aforementioned "Tragedy written in blood" that the Durge itself warns you about in it's little origin introduction.
It's very different than Tav, good or bad.
So take that as you wish.
1. is it worth playing D-urge 2 times one good one evil
2. is it a very different experience from playing Tav
It's different because you get a lot more personal story the entire game. Tav is bored
2. Yes, it is. The whole plot as you see it playing as common Tav turns inside out, and almost every essential fact in it gets a new meaning. I especially recommend reading thoroughly all notes and letters concerning main antagonists when playing DUrge. Yes, you'll still feel yourself as a runaway pawn on some villains' chessboard, but the taste of it between Tav and DUrge is completely different.