Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Anyway, in case you're wondering, here's the Latin spellcasters often recite when they are chanting their spells, and its translation ....
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vR0CEFejEO-3EU9-g6attwTHewRbD_cOz-LgslXw_AzgPUvTvbTfAOE-WPo5qJ6UmpCK1mtXxQowE-Y/pubhtml#
Try as one might, the only way to have a digital tabletop experience similar to a real tabletop experience is to have a Human DM and not a digital or even so-called "AI" DM. Video games must give over to video game rules at some point to appeal to videogamers.
Sure, but the game is balanced around EVERYONE being able to cast Fireball at will, if they have a scroll. It's totally do-able, but it definitely hamstrings you vs the way the game is constructed. In the Pathfinder games, they limit who can cast from scrolls, and it makes more sense (and the game is balanced accordingly).
Total cheese to rely on them by a non Wizard or rogue class.
Proper D&D would never allow it. I don't care if it's a video game.
And it was completely unnecessary and made the game even easier. It is not so hard for an average "gamer" to comprehend that some items are unusable by some classes, that's how armor and weapon proficiencies work already.
This doesn't appeal to "videogamers", it appeals to people who haven't played a videogame in their lives.
There were some changes to make from the PnP version, but this one was meaningless and made an already easy game based on a very easy system even easier and simpler.
This guy has an interesting take on these limitations.
https://harvey.thewrightspot.co.uk/blog/5e-rules/who-can-use-spell-scrolls-in-dnd-5e/
I kinda agree with his thinking. It should be difficult to use scrolls for non casters and require a difficulty check. The lower your INT and the higher the level of the spell vs. your level, the harder the scroll should be to read.
The only other thing that should be the case is a non caster should be less effective with a spell from a scroll than a caster ... and BG3 pretty much makes that the case. As a non caster won't have bonuses or modifiers a caster would.
It feels less like something the game is balanced around and more like something you can do if you want to *really* break the game, honestly.
They wanted to make the game as accessible as possible to people who have never seen a videogame in their life, and they did. Balance - I hardly know her.
I noticed latin so far only (that I understood), but your observation is interesting, give me an example. If you can't spell it, just tell me which spell it is and I'll listen harder the next time i hear it :)