Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
That is actually a great idea, to block these nonsense spammers who are only derailing the conversation.
These type of posts aren't made because of righteous indignation or some rigid , outdated moral doctrine, they are truly just fodder to feed off of.
Only ONE truth remains at the end of the day..."if you don't like it, don't play the game period.
I could care less what type romances are played out in a GAME of pixilated characters, in the end you make the choice to play or not, the rest of us could care less about your beliefs, but you are entitled to those beliefs, nonetheless!
The actual "relationship level" indicated by the relationship gauge apparently has zero effect on Astarion offering you the option of turning into a vampire. At least I wasn't able to get this option despite having the maximum level relationship (and other players have reported likewise). The option to get turned into a vampire only becomes available if you are romantically involved with Astarion. Which, if you are playing as a male, makes your character ♥♥♥.
In other words, if you want to become a vampire in BG3, you must play either as a ♥♥♥ male, or as a female. Straight males cannot get this option regardless of their "relationship level" with Astarion.
Vampire Spawn Potion
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/151
Now? Not happy with merely being a spawn? This potion will give you the full monty, or become an ascendant.
Become a Vampire
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/4907
Or ... go another route, and be the playable Dhampir race, which means you are of vampire ancestry.
https://www.nexusmods.com/baldursgate3/mods/4750
All these let you play as a vampire from the start of the game, you don't have to wait for Astarion to "gift" you anything.
Nonsense. Playing a vampire character is and was a long-time wish of many D&D fans. In multiple editions of table-top D&D this option is freely available to any character, with no limitation on their race, ♥♥♥ or ♥♥♥♥♥♥ orientation.
I've played the original BG1 and BG2 games when they came out, more than 20 years ago. BG2 particularly had a vampire faction, led by Irenicus' sister Bodhi, that you could side with (for a time). Ever since I've wanted to play a vampire character in a D&D CRPG.
I got excited for BG3 offering an option for the main character to become a vampire. However, it was extremely disappointing to discover that this option is only available to characters who romance Astarion, a male NPC.
Since I was role-playing a straight male character, and romancing Shadowheart, this option was denied to me, despite having the highest relationship level possible with Astarion as a companion (and despite having extremely high social skills, sufficient to make enemy bosses kill themselves etc.).
I think it doesn't make any sense for Larian to only limit the possibility of playing as a vampire to either ♥♥♥ male or female characters.
As a player who has legitimately bought this game on the Steam platform, I am entitled to express my opinion concerning this game on the Steam forum. Attempting to shut down all dissent won't work.
Then what are you doing here, spamming in a thread that you "couldn't care less" about?
Expressing disappointment with a bought product is not "whining".
Though complaining about others expressing their views may be.
None of these mods offer to get vampirism narratively/natively in the game. I don't want some ridiculous "potion of vampirism", becoming a vampire in D&D involves a ritual with another vampire, not just drinking a cheated-in potion.
Again, it's not about cheating in some "vampire powers". This is a D&D Role-Playing Game, I want to role-play as a vampire within the game's narrative, not just get some meaningless "+X" numbers on my character sheet.
Cool, if you want to role play within the game's built in narrative, well, they built in being able to become a vampire spawn through Astarion through one path - romancing Astarion.
"Being ♥♥♥ for Astarion" is a false claim, as you can also play a het female Tav romancing Astarion, and he will offer the same "Twilight" style option.
Don't simultaneously say "I won't use anything outside the game's built in narrative and options" AND say "oh but I don't have the option to be something that narrative doesn't offer."
"Darn it! Larian! Why won't Mizora agree to be MY warlock's patron also? How come he has to serve some random other Fiend! You're taking away options!"
So --that said -- let me be clear. You can most definitely express dis-satisfaction with not being offered a certain option within the game to Larian. The place to do so is Suggestions & Feedback, a different subforum than this one, and i encourage you to do so.
Cheers!
You do know that roleplay a ♥♥♥ character in a fantasy game doesn't make you ♥♥♥ any more than roleplaying an elf makes you any elf, right? Maybe grow a pair and stop getting hung up on your insecurities. If I can play a cishet male, you can play a ♥♥♥/bi male. And there have been tons more games that force me to play as cishet male no matter what ( As in no option at all to be ♥♥♥, bi, or even female ) than games that force you to play ♥♥♥/bi male ( Or a straight female ) for one specific option that doesn't even really have any impact on the overall game.
A dhampir is a completely different race (half-vampire), which is not available in BG3 (unlike becoming a vampire), I don't even know why you are bringing it up.
Which is precisely the problem, since Astarion is male. So the only way to become a vampire in BG3 is by engaging in a romantic relationship with a male. I.e., by playing either as a ♥♥♥ male, or as a female.
If you had actually read the posts you're replying, including the OP, you'd have seen that I am playing as a MALE character, and my issue was that STRAIGHT MALE characters can't get the option of becoming a vampire.
Why shouldn't I be able to say that? Yes, I believe that if a game offers players a narrative way of becoming a vampire, this option should not be gated behind a specific ♥♥♥ or ♥♥♥♥♥♥ orientation, and should be available to all players, just like it is in tabletop D&D.
There are even TWO specific systems in the game for interaction with companions and other NPCs - the relationship system and the social skill system - which could have easily been used by Larian to require a certain "level of trust" or "companionship" needed for Astarion to agree to make you a vampire, or be convinced to do so, instead of gating it behind ♥♥♥/♥♥♥♥♥♥ orientation and thus excluding straight male characters. However, Larian elected to ignore its own game design in order to force players to engage in a romantic relationship with a ♥♥♥/bi male character if they wanted to play as a vampire.
First, you're not "forum police" and have neither right nor moral authority to dictate what other users are posting.
Second, this is a "General discussions" forum which does not exclude expressing dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the game.
Offering a suggestion to where your feedback might be more effective isn't being the "forum police".... 🙄
Sure ... just as a vampire spawn is also not a vampire. Your thread says Astarion can't make you a vampire. Totally correct, he can only make you a vampire spawn. Since we're being technical, your thread title is wrong.
I have good sir. But the THREAD TITLE in your OP says "you must be ♥♥♥ for Astarion to become a vampire". Except, he can't make you a vampire, and you don't have to be ♥♥♥, so your thread title contains two lies.
You can fix it anytime you like.
I believe my warlock should be able to choose Mizora as his patron. The game doesn't offer that, and it's clearly in D & D rules. LARIAN! REFUND NOW!
Didn't say I was "forum police." However, pointing out how the different subforums here at Steam are used is within my rights, and so is suggesting where this type of suggestion would be most effective, if you really want Larian to make changes to the game.
I honestly think it would be even more effective at Larian's own forum's Suggestion box, but I believe they do read the one here at Steam, if far less often.