Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's a good point, Banelord. There's no right answer, only a natural equilibrium.
This comes from someone who actually likes the "lady of battle" archetype and well-made female power figures. Those differ greatly from the stand-ins for modern "strong women" who think that the right way to go about being one is to embrace about every obnoxious traditionally "masculine" trait there is.
So at least the developers deserve a bit of credit for allowing the players to sell Aylin to about the slimiest man there is, or have Isobel turn into a shadow revenant.
The term 'snowflake' has reversed no?
Small Sword Energy
Do you know something, Angel?
Larian overdid a LOT in the number of women in this game in fighters\boss positions or overall "common man class" since violence and aggression is a male trait and females are more kind and pacific. They probably wanted equilibrium in this but grotesquely missed the mark, it turn very disbalanced\weird.
There was one or two really feminine chars in the whole game in comparison to the predominant Gigantor style of women hahaha
Hell, initially I thought it was some hidden lore where most of man died or it is in few numbers to this discrepancy but after the ridiculous responses in my thread other day it's very clear it was deliberately Larian decision because yes