Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hah! Now that reminds me of the South Park joke where Star Wars should be sold to China instead of Disney.
A license transfer is not going to happen before Hasbro is done destroying the brand.
agree and support 100 percent! pls do
This does not qualify them to be custodian of a sprawling international IP like DnD which is currently still a predominantly book selling business.
Hasbro would be wise to sell off DnD but WoTC will try to hold on to the digital side of things. D&D Beyond and that DnDOne virtual tabletop stuff (where Larian could technically become a competitor if they wished and no legalities keep them from doing so) as that's the sort of subscription milking that they brought those Microsoft execs who thought the OpenGL would be revokable on board for.
Also, shame on you for not properly crediting the Roll For Combat channel...
I'm not sure I agree with Larian's following DnD tradition... I mean, sure, they did a great job in BG3 regarding following 5e rules to the last bit (as far as I know) and, technically, implementing complex, intertwined, quests without making the software an unplayable mess plus, moat important, selling a single, complete product, and not a buy DLC trap.... But in terms of role play and canon they left a few holes unplugged... And re-wrote some important, historical, characters...
I do think that WotC played a significant role in this aspect of BG3. However, it seems like Larian managed to keep it within tolerable norms, while staying true to the lore of Faerun, at least to my trained eye. This is exactly why I think Larian's acquisition of D&D could be a real game-changer. Free from those corporate shackles, who knows what they could achieve?
I don't watch south park anymore but I gotta hear the point of this joke. What did they imply would happen if china bought it instead?
Alright, the fact is that Hasbros in a bit of a tough spot moneywise, and theyve got D&D thats cool but not really what theyre all about. Now, there's Larian, that's really good at making CRPGs.
If Hasbro sells D&D to Larian, they get a bunch of cash to help fix their money troubles. Plus, Larian could take D&D to the next level, which is the outcome Im hoping for, and Hasbro might still get a cut from Larians future success without having to do the heavy lifting.
Win Win.
Basically, your right that making computer RPGs, like what Larian does, is different from creating tabletop RPGs, like DnD. Larians good at tehir video game stuff, but running a game thats played with dice and friends around a table would be a new ball game for them.
When CCP bought White Wolf things indeed didn't go so well, which could make folks a bit nervous about Larian handling DnD. But, from what you too can see, and I agree - Larian seems to be a decent company, they MIGHT handle things better.