Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
None of this is spoiler because this is established lore. BG3 uses this as its foundation.
However, the Red Prince and Fane can be found in paintings in BG3. (Fane's portrait is in the Refectory part of the Overgrown Ruins, the part accessed from the Chapel Entrance, not the Ravaged Beach. Inspect the Portrait of Fane on the wall. It's easier to see and has a description when inspected.)
more seriously with the idea that nwn was saved with by HLC and mods, what I was trying to say in so many words and partial drunkardness is that NWN had a solid, if flawed, foundation. That could be me wearing the thickest rose tinted glasses. Never played nor heard of dungeon siege so I can't give an opinion if it's good or not.
Well... I guess everyone has their first love.
Curiously NWN was the game that put the final nail on the Computer DnD coffin for me, for a loooong time.
Fresh from the perfect BG2 I went into Planetscape Torment... Only to find I don't like Planetscape world AND bored to death by those "book size" dialogues... Then Icewind Dale... Too shallow, felt like a giant arena, finally NWN... NWN, If I recall was the first attempt at real 3D DnD, problem was that EVERYTHING looked like a square room, including outdoor environments, and since I already had lost my patience with the previous two I buried the genre, crowned BG2 as the first and BEST DnD ruler for all time and that was it. I kept playing BG2 for years, run after run, years apart, sometimes, whenever I felt the urge to go at it again.
Then (decades passed) and came BG3... I didn't jump in when someone said they were, finally and at long last, continuing the BG series, I had problems in the past with hopping in "developing" games that never finish so... 6 years passed, they finally finished the game (when I was already giving up they would, thinking it was another one of "those" scams...) and, given the reviews, I finally took it out of my wish list and bought it. I must say that I was pleasantly surprised. I didn't thought it was so good, a true successor... Then came the "cringe, you know what," scenes, the canon infringements but I eventually went around that, laughed it out or just shook my head in sarcasm and enjoyed what is truly a rarity these days... A full game, no DLC's, you pay what you get, complete, outstanding graphics and music, and complexity, and compelling story, lots of quests, lots of hidden content, great combats, a little bit too easy but, ok and a canon DnD rules implementation (not truly canon on lore though, some flaws there). So, not being perfect, it is a true successor to the BG family
That said, if they remade BG2 with modern graphics and music it would probably grade it
a notch above, BG2 still rules supreme, I guess, but BG3 is an incredible game, a worthy successor and a deserving GOTY recipient.
Just a good game about dungeon siege
It was a solid system and easily-accessible to creators. And back in the early days of of computer gaming, the audience was, sadly, smarter and more dedicated. The FLynn effect has long since reversed and begun that long, slow slide to stupidity.