Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also the above guy is right and you may have disadvantage from long range, lack of darkvision, or even darkvision range.
That said, there really is no reason to ever use the actual sneak attack ability. The reaction version is superior in 99% of situations. Using the ability and missing counts as your sneak attack, the reaction only counts if it actually hits.
LOS is fully modeled in BG3. You may have noticed different attack status when targeting different body locations on a target. Some targets cannot be hit except for one tiny part. If a target is prone, might not be able to hit the parts farther away, while you can hit the nearer parts.
So, you are doing nothing wrong. That is how BG3 works. :)
I would say it's meant to show that he's being more precise with his shot, which means he can't be as far away and requires a clearer view of the target. You can kind of eyeball a shot at a partially obscured target, but you can't do that with a precision shot.