Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Baelen and Derryth Bonecloak, with the Nobelstalk, again, not ideal couple.
That guy you resque from burning in Waukeen's Rest, who's wife died there.
Yenna's mother's missing. Maybe Yenna's adopted, but it's just as easy to assume there was a dad in the picture at some point. The first kid you are forced to meet when entering act 3.
Lots of idle chatter in Act 3 regarding hetero parents and their kids. Not a lot of idle chatter in act 2 at all. Who'd want to have idle chats with the shadows on the doorstep?
And this applies even if the kid was adopted. You need a mother and a father, at least for most races, even in D&D to create a kid.
But I didnt want to be overly reductive and just say "The existence of every humanoid character in the game implies that their exists a pair of parents for them that were straight"
What I alluded to, was that of 2 main characters of the game, we know and meet at least one parent who would have had a partner.
also none of the above is represented like aylin and isobel or larissa and her chick.
At least time ago.
And that they are not "represented" like Isobel and Aylin may be the result of, I dunno, Aylin literally being the daughter of the god isobel worships, being a literal angel, being the "artifact" that the whole of act 2 revolves around.
When it comes to Lakrissa, then I have to say, ehm, no? At the very least Bex and Danis are represented the exact same.
Oh right. I was at first only considering parents of which we meet at least one as an alive character.
The point was not that there are "some hetero couples" the point was that ignorant bigots will gleefully pretend that these hetero couples dont actually exist, in order to push the idea that the game is "over-representing" non-traditional partnerships.
It's the current parents of the kids and no evidence of magics being used to change the birth means in BG3.
The issue is people are focusing on the non-hetero relationships and completely ignoring the masses of hetero ones.
Because "Many DMs" are not the de-facto deciders of lore within the Forgotten Realms.
Yeah.. nope, you lost me there. Since everyone is always yelling about equality, this is pretty much the same as if my GF/wife would tell me - "hey, I love you but I need to eff that other dude to produce offspring - which by the way, you will be legally responsible for and you will raise. if you love me, you'll understand me and agree with it"
Just .. no.
As usual, resort to "magic" when things don't work as the narrative wants to go. Of course, selectively - working on the bits where it aligns with the said narrative. For instance, it's funny that there is an in-lore magic like disguise self which pretty much allows for changing genders, yet T is a thing in the game. The entire point about T was to transition, wasn't it? So use the "magic" and be done with it? Aaaah... but you see - that goes against the narrative - because suddenly there's no need for that thing at all! Oh bollocks.
maybe the magic version someone else mentioned.
also @thodosguard: you should learn the meaning of the word "could"