安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpUrXJNcS_8
But why?
Have fun with that I guess.
It'd have been funnier if the video was about dragons or something though after
"Modern D&D won't allow this scientific fact to be modeled."
Neither do any other appearance customization options. Why's this one special in that it's a problem for you?
Or Bludgeoning dmg? 🤔🤭
I think we have established that D&D 5E will not allow male mammals to be modeled stronger than the females.
I think we've established that in D&D land, the female mammals are equal or superior to the males (like for insects).
You're some kind of bad joke, right?
🤣😆🤭🫣
As long as they don't look too muscular, I'm pretty scrawny.
A big thanks to everybody who got involved.
To the person who said they were annoyed at the idea of STR stat hit because she was a female, read my final posts. Gygax and Arneson could have offered compensation with a +1 to another ability. Notice that males would get a penalty on the stat of their choice to compensate for the STR+1.
I'd also say that I would probably not enjoy sitting at the table with you, where you are imagining that you're equally as strong as I am. I'm willing to be weaker than you in one stat. But when it comes to STR, I really want that to be an identity for the male lane. It's our lane first and foremost. It's part of our identity. We deserve that. Stay in your lane.
They have almost every other lane that exists.