Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So which is it? Is it fantasy? Or is it real life? It's a rhetorical question as I don't expect an honest answer here.
P.S. We have STRONG female presence pushed everywhere - in academia, in workspace, in politics, in leadership and it seems - now in video-games too. It's hard to blame those folks who want a safe heaven from the politics of the day in a video game only to find out it's waiting for them there all the same.
And no - I'm not talking out of some "statistics" or what have you tell me is "made up". As someone responsible for hiring for a large department I literally get gender quotas to fill, regardless of qualification. Each deviation from that quota because I want to hire a qualified person instead of a correct gender person creates friction oftentimes going up to 3-4 levels above me. I know what I'm talking about and I kind of don't want to see it pushed onto me in games too.
Oh, and I forgot to mention - once our company got big enough, it was legally required to have a female board member. So some person just rolled into a top job without doing what other three guys did - building it from scratch through thick and thin, sacrificing the huge part of their lives to it, working 70-80 hours a week for years. Nope - why do that when you have a legally protected quota?
Truth.
But try and tell that to some of these trolls. They're the same kinda people who complained about the concept of "safe spaces" when that was trendy a few years ago.
But here we are and they're crying and demanding everything fit their narrow world view so that they don't feel threatened.
Why do you feel you needed to state the obvious?
I mean let's be real it's probably you patting yourself on the back here. Your posts and when you choose to post is as easy to predict as a clock being right twice a day.
id795etc has the best answer.
THIS! the amount of fragile males in the forums btching about it and calling the game woke like omg!
I understand the points you make, and it's true: when something alligns with a desired narrative, we all tend to agree with it and find justifications. The thing is that the narrative here is simply "hey we added strong females because now females are part of everything and we also have a bigger female player base". I won't go into a full analysis of this paragraph you wrote:
"P.S. We have STRONG female presence pushed everywhere - in academia, in workspace, in politics, in leadership and it seems - now in video-games too. It's hard to blame those folks who want a safe heaven from the politics of the day in a video game only to find out it's waiting for them there all the same."
but it's worth mentioning that the female presence isn't simply "pushed", it's something that has been happening because actual female presence is stronger that it was before. It's only natural that, when met with strong opposition, those who want to be part of something fight for their place. The way it's being done may not be the best possible way, but it clearly is the best way people found so far. Would I do it differently? absolutely.
Since each country has their own reality, and what's right for a European country may be bad for the US, it's hard to find an unified way to address the same issues.
The quotas situation you mentioned it's a problematic one. Quotas are necessary but are being wrongly implemented. We can agree on that. The thing is:
can we accept females as part of a game? can we be chill when they aren't simply sexy decoration? can we say oh this is a strong character and forget their gender?
or do we always need to fight for females to be portrayed as the weaker gender?
or as sexy companions?
with this conversation we aren't going to solve the real-world wrong doings you and I can discuss.... still, am I being unreasonable when I ask "if we are willing to accept any weird thing in this game, why aren't willing to accept strong female characters?"
maybe this discussion doesn't need to be extremely deep, and doesn't need to contemplate all the gender issues we are facing in the real world. Maybe it can be as simple as asking ourselves "is this a fight worth having when we are talking about a fantasy game and no real harm is being done? no hate speech, no abuse, no cruelty. nothing where we need to freak out about a religion or culture or race being portrayed as evil or corrupt."?
I agree we need to fight the good fight when we see something outrageous or offensive, harmful, dangerous, violent, abusive. Is this the case?
does it really bug you that women are actually getting somewhere in the society and getting heard?