Lawful evil or chaotic evil

[cire87]

I havent decided the flavor of evil i want , but my current playthrough is neutral good and it seems like i would miss alot of content if i do any version of evil

[Sir. Foxford]

If you started as dark urge you have lots of funny moments. Also, slayer is kinda fun to play if you unlock it. Being 100% evil has been one of my most fun playthrus so far.

[cire87]

i take it back id probably be neutral or chaotic evil , being lawful kinda sucks

[cire87]

Originally posted by Twerkulies:

If you started as dark urge you have lots of funny moments. Also, slayer is kinda fun to play if you unlock it. Being 100% evil has been one of my most fun playthrus so far.

nice

[Sir. Foxford]

Originally posted by cire87:

i take it back id probably be neutral or chaotic evil , being lawful kinda sucks

On one of my evil characters I was incredibly racist towards tieflings. Any one I saw I murdered. It was great.

[cire87]

is there a difference between murder hobo and chaotic evil ?

[cire87]

Originally posted by cire87:

is there a difference between murder hobo and chaotic evil ?

like lets say i murder everyone and everything in act 1

[cire87]

yea being lawful to either side seems to suck and be hard to maintain

[ChrisPharmD]

There is no alignment in this game because you literally can't be evil. You can be good with the flavor of evil. All outcomes are good regardless of input.

[cire87]

Originally posted by ChrisPharmD:

There is no alignment in this game because you literally can't be evil. You can be good with the flavor of evil. All outcomes are good regardless of input.

i just like to roleplay in my head as an alignment

[That1GingerKid]

Originally posted by ChrisPharmD:

There is no alignment in this game because you literally can't be evil. You can be good with the flavor of evil. All outcomes are good regardless of input.

Yah killing everyone in the grove, murdering the cleric protecting the town from the absolute that also helps you, and betraying your party members at various opportunities is a very morally good thing to do. don't know how smooth your brain has to be to think you cant be evil.

[That1GingerKid]

it depends on what you do. for instance i know that if you kill the grove you only get locked out of wyll, halsim and karlack. and you get another party (only one) member instead. you do louse out on like the shops and stuff once you betray everyone, obviously. however it seems like you do get some kind of trade off, especialy if you go dark urge as you get certain items for doing bad stuff. i never did a 100% evil run tho.

[Quacksalber]

Originally posted by That1GingerKid:

Originally posted by ChrisPharmD:

There is no alignment in this game because you literally can't be evil. You can be good with the flavor of evil. All outcomes are good regardless of input.

Yah killing everyone in the grove, murdering the cleric protecting the town from the absolute that also helps you, and betraying your party members at various opportunities is a very morally good thing to do. don't know how smooth your brain has to be to think you cant be evil.

I know right? I'm also not convinced all end game outcomes are good. In mine, sure we beat the big bad, but to do it we had to do something that was arguably pretty terrible. I dunno what happens if you do not do it, but it did not feel "good",

Evil does not mean being one of those baddies in fiction who just want everything to end. It also does not mean being faced with impossible choices and picking one, like in my example above, of course. Still not an inherently good ending if you have to do something bad to achieve it, though,

[cire87]

what happens if i kill everyone in the grove and everyone in the temple (goblin leaders etc)