Is BG3 DOS 3 ?

[mods twist his balls]

Let's settle the debate once and for all

DOS 2:
-Turn Based
-Cringy dialogues
-Origin system
-Toilet Chain system
-Surface based combat
-No random encounters
-no pretty cinematics
BG1/2 :
-RtwP
-Kinda cringy dialogues
-No origin system
-No toilet chain system
-No surface based combat
-Random encounters
-no pretty cinematics

BG3 :
-Turn based
-Cringy dialogues
-Origin system
-Toilet chain system
-Not surface based combat anymore
-no Random encounters
-pretty cinematics

Conclusion: BG3 is not DOS 3 because it doesn't have a surface based combat but it sure as heck is not a worty BG1/2 successor.

[Heu, Iterum Id Feci]

What does a Baldurs Gate game need? I'd say the city of Baldurs Gate would be a good start...guess what game doesn't have Baldurs Gate?
Hint: Baldurs Gate has been confirmed for BG3...

[Alealexi]

As far as I see it is a worthy successor.

[haasi]

the outcome is confusing cause if you compare the lists, dos and bg3 have alot more in common?

[larhtas]

Who own the Licence is the only line you should have written.

[mods twist his balls]

Originally posted by Darth Waldi:

What does a Baldurs Gate game need? I'd say the city of Baldurs Gate would be a good start...guess what game doesn't have Baldurs Gate?
Hint: Baldurs Gate has been confirmed for BG3...

Having super heroes in your moveis doesn't make it a super hero movie.

Originally posted by haasi:

the outcome is confusing cause if you compare the lists, dos and bg3 have alot more in common?

Surfaces are such an important thing in DOS2 that not having them is a game changer imo

[mods twist his balls]

Originally posted by larhtas:

Who own the Licence is the only line you should have written.

Nah, watching things through corporate lenses is not a good thing.

[haasi]

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Originally posted by Darth Waldi:

What does a Baldurs Gate game need? I'd say the city of Baldurs Gate would be a good start...guess what game doesn't have Baldurs Gate?
Hint: Baldurs Gate has been confirmed for BG3...

Having super heroes in your moveis doesn't make it a super hero movie.

Originally posted by haasi:

the outcome is confusing cause if you compare the lists, dos and bg3 have alot more in common?

Surfaces are such an important thing in DOS2 that not having them is a game changer imo

that makes sense

[Heu, Iterum Id Feci]

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Originally posted by Darth Waldi:

What does a Baldurs Gate game need? I'd say the city of Baldurs Gate would be a good start...guess what game doesn't have Baldurs Gate?
Hint: Baldurs Gate has been confirmed for BG3...

Having super heroes in your moveis doesn't make it a super hero movie.

But would a super hero movie without Super heroes be a super hero movie?

[larhtas]

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Originally posted by larhtas:

Who own the Licence is the only line you should have written.

Nah, watching things through corporate lenses is not a good thing.

Yes it is. They paid the licence, they own the game.

[mods twist his balls]

Originally posted by larhtas:

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Nah, watching things through corporate lenses is not a good thing.

Yes it is. They paid the licence, they own the game.

Sure. Doesn't make it a good sequel though. Again, I'm no WoTC investor, couldn't care less about the suits and what they consider a sequel.

[desrtfox071]

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Let's settle the debate once and for all

DOS 2:
-Turn Based
-Cringy dialogues
-Origin system
-Toilet Chain system
-Surface based combat
-No random encounters
-no pretty cinematics
BG1/2 :
-RtwP
-Kinda cringy dialogues
-No origin system
-No toilet chain system
-No surface based combat
-Random encounters
-no pretty cinematics

BG3 :
-Turn based
-Cringy dialogues
-Origin system
-Toilet chain system
-Not surface based combat anymore
-no Random encounters
-pretty cinematics

Conclusion: BG3 is not DOS 3 because it doesn't have a surface based combat but it sure as heck is not a worty BG1/2 successor.

No, it clearly isn't D:OS3 for anyone willing to actually look at what's being made. Besides that, WoTC own the IP. They determine what is, or isn't in the IP.


BG3 is BG3. It's that simple.

[Mosey]

Low grade bait.

Didn't even mention the minor fact all 3 use entirely different mechanics and two of them are based on versions of D&D with something to the tune of 30 years of development between them.

Might was well complain that Fallout 3 was nothing like Fallout 2 or that D20 even exists at all.

Best of luck with going back in time to your childhood.

[mods twist his balls]

Originally posted by Mosey:

Low grade bait.

Didn't even mention the minor fact all 3 use entirely different mechanics and two of them are based on versions of D&D with something to the tune of 30 years of development between them.

Might was well complain that Fallout 3 was nothing like Fallout 2 or that D20 even exists at all.

Best of luck with going back in time to your childhood.

I'm definitely the youngest person in this thread and Fallout 3 is not a Fallout game

[desrtfox071]

Originally posted by Animan studio original video:

Originally posted by Mosey:

Low grade bait.

Didn't even mention the minor fact all 3 use entirely different mechanics and two of them are based on versions of D&D with something to the tune of 30 years of development between them.

Might was well complain that Fallout 3 was nothing like Fallout 2 or that D20 even exists at all.

Best of luck with going back in time to your childhood.

I'm definitely the youngest person in this thread and Fallout 3 is not a Fallout game

Well, you're certainly entitled to your subjective opinion, but factually, Fallout 3, 4 and even 76 are indeed Fallout games.

Are you a true Scotsman?

[Hobocop]

Pretty sure New Vegas is a Fallout game as well.