Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just my two cents: I'm totally against the woke bandwagon and even often boycott quite a lot of things because of it, but I didn't even saw what you are talking about in the game, the reason probably being that I don't have the same perception of classes "virility" as yourself. Imho, besides the barbarian the most ruthless class RP wise is clearly the Warlock, and Wyll is a male, so I don't see the problem as you did at all, not even speaking about the villains where the warrior ones a still more often males.
Perhaps I would have had more of a problem if immersion if the setting has been changed to make it women centric, but that's not the case at all.
Just sorry I could at least try to seduce way more girls, as all the games shortstacks are out of the party, but well, that's a minor concern.
On the other hand I do get the strong feeling that the writers definitely have biases and sometimes they show quite a bit.
If the only 'woke' element that stuck out to me was women 'coincidentally' being physically stronger and more imposing than men(more health, more strength, more aggresive playstyle just by the grace of being a barbarian or fighter) I'd probably not be replying to this thread at all.
Not one specific feature of a story makes something automatically woke. Having a female or gay protagonist does not automatically make a story woke and the same goes for... well, anything that might coincidentally align with current political views of the authors in question. But that's just the thing...
The sum of 'woke' elements, their presentation as well as the current zeitgeist is what defines these features and facets of a story, be it in book form or video or video game form, is what ultimately makes the whole product woke.
Take for example the exploration of the refugee crisis situation, it happens not once in BG3 but twice... and each time the game clearly tries to portray the refugees as poor victims and those who wish to bar them entry as clearly evil and in the wrong, albeit you are free to side with them and outright murder all the Tieflings or chase them out(and forfeit a huge amount of content along with some companions). I don't get the vibe the writers were very neutral about defining the argument of each side at all. Of course on the other hand the game is already chalk full of choices and consequences and perhaps trying to include every possible outcome under the sun is an unrealistic expectation to begin with.
Anyway modern media does seem lacking in men who represent the more classic type of masculinity as of late. Men like Luke, Aragorn, Iron Man, Conan the Barbarian. Men that are strong, resourceful as well as intelligent. So yeah, that does kind of disqualify Minsc in my view, he's a goofball.
While BG3 does not exactly go out of its way to make fools out of men by putting them down to elevate female characters like Captain Marvel or whatever it remains at best rather neutral.
All the men are some sort of misfits... same could be said for the female companions but compare this to the Suicide Squad movies for example that had far more 'classic' masculine representation despite everyone being some sort of a misfit destined to die(just as we are due to the tadpoles).
Everyone likes to bring up Wyll as an example, yeah okay, he's literally held on a leash by a far more powerful woman on whose teat he's meant to suckle in order to keep his powers but perhaps I am reading too much into it. If I had to pick the most 'masculine' companion I'd probably go with Halsin because he's... well, he looks big I guess and he is a leader despite choosing to abandon his position to follow you in order to do away with the Shadow Curse.
Other than that my favourite male character has to be Ketheric Thorm, classic Byronic antihero. I liked Gortash as well, actually, he seemed to have a certain code of honour as long as you proved worthy of his respect.
Astarion is nowhere near your classic male hero. He seems to loosely fall into the same stereotype as Wesley from Princess Bride(another great male protagonist imo) but he does not have that... energy at all. The only energy I ever get from Astarion is 'Yass kween' whenever you do something evil or mischevious.
And don't get me started on Cazador. Here I thought Astarion sounded as gay as it gets in a medieval inspired fantasy universe but no. All that build up and the guy sounds the very opposite of intimidating. You might as well have had Arabella turn villain and she'd still be more imposing than Cazador.
At least Raphael lived up to his name as a fairly imposing and scheming devil despite being literally gay for himself.
Quite the opposite.
Another contrary comment that wasn't thought through past the knee-jerk reflex to disagree.
Victims of sexual abuse are in fact far, far more likely to become abusers themselves. That's criminology 101.
Which would be completely in line with Astarion's cruel streak coming entirely from being abused, too, which is intentional. We're supposed to see him as a victim lashing out at the world. The expression "♥♥♥♥ rolls downhill" comes to mind.