Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Forge Cleric.
Artificer is a must. They are already in game, just not as a playable class.
Harengon race. My wife adores them.
It's so bizarre to me that they didn't go out of their way to include the psionic subclasses for this game.
To be honest i expect Artificer at realse because at 5e Artificer is vanila class in phb
More seriously, rune knights can be very interesting and Cloud Rune can be quite impactful.
Not sure why they left Articifer out, too.
Horizon Walker Ranger would be cool.
*snort* Definitely.
Every wizard school is subpar except for necromancy. Bard College of Valour doesnt compare to Lore cutting words. Cleric Life, Knowledge, Trickery, Nature and War are all weak. Rogue arcane trickster is bad. Ranger Hunter and Beast Master suck. Monk Way of Four Elements bad. Every Fighter subclass is weak after lv 3, it's just that the base class is strong. Druid Circle of Land and Spores are both garbage because druid has mostly concentration spells. Barb & Sorc Wild Magic both far worse than their other choices.
Bladesinger could be very fun especially if Artificer would be added