Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As the person above mentioned, evil on a divine scale does not need a rationale.
Bhaal is more akin to the god of the concept of murder then merely murder itself.
To be specific violence and ritualistic killing.
Only the Kua-toa bring their god's into existence by believing in them.
Bhaal is an actual living, well unliving entity that can be worshiped.
Aztec ain't so strange they believe that Tlaloc would request children to cry so the tears would wet the earth.
blood offering of humans are rare cause. and it makes more sense then Bhaal
if so then the game portrait Bhaal wrong.
i can understand a "hunting god" like predator for example
Well hunter in the sense that it needs to be intelligent life.
That can comprehend it's own suffering.
How does it portray him wrong when the whole Bhaal plot in Act 3 is about solving the grand ritual composed of killing specific victims, lol?:)
That would be Malar.