Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Outstanding thing in BG3 is, that they got no own sexuality at all, they are all just omnisexual, what ruins the character.
It's simply just lazy writing.
Baldurs Gate 1 and 2 were already Super Open Minded on most Stuff.
So its not that Surprising.
Albeit I also think Larian Rubbed it on Extra Thick because People Challenged them on it.
Ummm… nope. D&D was/is design neutral, as far as sexual orientation is concerned. It provides a roleplaying framework for a group of friends to tell their own stories in any way they see fit. Sex, sexuality, politics, etc. is not part of D&D.
The girdle of m/f was/is a CURSED item and was originally considered humorous. It has existed in the DM Guides going back to the beginning of AD&D (probably before you were born, unless I miss my guess). The item has nothing to do with supporting or not supporting LGBTQ+… unless your group of table top gaming friends makes it thus in your imaginations.
imagine if the game didn't have such flaws.