Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
he has no idea what he is talking about
Are you sure about that?:
😉
"The additional performance from frame generation can be extremely beneficial in very demanding situations such as gaming at 4K with maximum ray tracing settings or when framerates are heavily CPU-limited."
https://community.amd.com/t5/gaming/first-look-at-amd-fidelityfx-super-resolution-3/ba-p/626581
edit: Just looked up your link. First 2 games are Forspoken and Immortals of Aveum, both total trash games, don't know what AMD is thinking here.
LOL. Whether it's CPU limited depends on the, you know, GPU. There are tons of people with a lower-level GPU that already see big fps and playability benefits by turning on freaking FSR 1.0 as it stands now--it just has "issues" that make it sub-optimal to use. 2.2 or 3 will definitely "help". Sheesh.
Don't count on it.
The thing i hate with the FSR implementation in this game is no matter which quality setting you will always have artifacting going around with the NPC's hair.