Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
? He's asking what sort of penis on a dragonkin would satisfy your criticism. That's all.
It sounds so much more fun if this whole thread could drop the American politics and debate what a dragonkin penis should be like.
Benchmark Clarifications:
Clarification 1: Instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be
applied for their personal benefit.
Which giving the previous line
Benchmark Clarifications:
Clarification 1: Instruction includes the use of a map to show westward expansion.
SS.68.AA.2.3
Examine the various duties and trades performed by slaves (e.g., agricultural
work, painting, carpentry, tailoring, domestic service, blacksmithing,
transportation).
Seems ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ obvious
Sounds like you and the author are reading into the motivations of the line, rather than the obvious context. That context being the situation freed slaves where in after gaining their freedom. They needed jobs, and many of them gained skills during slavery. Thats not saying that slavery was some kind of internship. Thats such a dishonest reading
This isn't the games fault, that's an D&D 5e issue. In fact, I was surprised that Githyanki was still allowed to be racist in 5e, considering how they smashed down all that stuff over the last years.
This is a serious stretch. Seems more immersive\thematically consistant to me. Army of the absolute is ravaging the country-side, killing and pillaging on their way to Baldurs Gate, so people flee towards the city = refugee chrisis. Seems thematically consistant.
Is WItcher 3 woke, because it also had refugees (fleeing the war torn country side)? Is Wasteland 2 woke? Kingdom Come: Deliverence?
Again, D&D issue. Women and men have always had equal standing in D&D (as lore material is written, homebrews not accounted for, obviously). Though I'll agree I don't like Karlach, and she's written too much like "dude bro #3234", which too be fair, even if she was a man, it'd be off putting.
So got many thousand examples of people being coerced? There will always be outlier cases, but those shouldn't be the deciding factor for the whole. People being coerced lead to such as pizzagate too. What and who should be banned for that?
I think you're missing the entire point of the conversation...
No one is saying the game is grooming children...
The church I was referring to is the catholic church...
If you cant say no, you're insecure af.
I don't like the concepts surrounding " Do it my way or suffer for eternity ".
Presented to children that is a much more scary concept.
And this game is mature rated, therefore, children by default should not be able to play the games, if the parents are doing theyr responsibillitys.
By your definition, Lae'zel, Shadowheart, Alfira, Jaheira, Minthara, etc. are not women.