Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yea the side quests are better than the main. But still poor compared to say Witcher 3’s…
And if I'm being silly and engaging with your bit of hyperbole, any game that tops the Steam charts and garners the play numbers right now (~650,000 playing atm) isn't going to be tragically forgotten. Game devs don't make posts asking people to "gently push back" against this game as a new standard in video games if it's a forgettable game.
Forgettable as in people will forget this game as soon as a “more polished” game comes along (not hard to due just look at act 3)…the story is what people will truly remember (Planescape, Diablo I/II, Final Fantasy 7/8, etc…)
My only problem was how overrated the nether brain was.
A threat to all of farun?
Have you been to farun?
There are big bads out there that make the netherbrain look like a dogs chew toy.
The red wizards of thay comes to mind.
Or any of the half a billion liches, dragons, etc.
So many things that would just slaughter the nether brain
The nether brain was a local threat.
Not a world ending one.
And honestly i prefer that.
I am tired of saving the world.
It just makes the world look incompetent when something that can be brought down by 4 idiots is considered a world ending threat.
And lets be honest here.
Adventures need to be idiots to risk there life for spare change.
Honestly speaking, I just doubt that'll happen in the next decade, the way games have gone recently. Even with issues this game is much more polished and well put together than really anything we've gotten lately. Most of my AAA games in the past couple years are cookie cutter re-releases of rehashed IPs where they mash in player retention systems and a MTX system they stole from a competitor. Looking at you, Diablo 4 and Darktide Hell, even look at the examples you listed. Final Fantasy 7 and Diablo 2 were released >20 years ago. And while they were indeed enjoyable, I'm not revisiting them as the 'destroyer of all my current games.'
So I think BG3 will slot nicely into the "wasn't full of MTX, sold without DLCs, fun world and system" and will endure, in my opinion.
I love DAO, but eaven with rose tinted googles the story wasen't quite as epic as you are projecting.
It had it's highlights sure, but much of it are pretty forgettable.
The only thing I remember from Diablo and II is Deckard Cain saying "Stay a while and listen...", cow levels, and Wirt's Leg. XD
Comon tell me you are joking.
DAO was a good game but there is nothing so vanilla and unoriginal as "defeating the evil dark horde " trope.
Hell you could say that the absolute is just another deus ex machina but at least more original then DAO's darkspawn horde.
I swear people seem to forget all the other crap that was present in both BG2 and DAO and only remember the good side with rose coloured glasses.
BG3 is better overall then DAO, change my mind.
The darkspawn invasion was just the overarching theme tho (a classic “evil horde invasion”)…the stories along the way were great too like the mountain & Denerim sections.
Other games with great stories that are remembered to this day are KotoR & Deus Ex 2000 & Human Revolution…BG3 will NOT be among the group…