Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The thing is, the 5th edition ditched moral compass. The LG-CE axis.
So it does not really matter if you are a holy paladin. You can encounter a Holy Paladin of Lolth:D
Shadowheart i would not give upon yet, if you talk with her, you will have a strange suspicion. The githyanki girl also goes through some development. Gale stays Gale(annoying as hell), Astarion stays the same...Halsin...becomes hell of an annoying second Gale. Karlach is a good option. Jaheira is too late for the party:)
Githzerai were always underrated.
Gale, Wyll, and Karlach are all perfectly reasonable for a party with a holy paladin (I assume you mean a traditional LG paladin). It's not like parties in tabletop D&D have ever perfectly aligned with such characters, so it's kind of silly to expect that in this game.
Well, Tieflings are not innately evil and can even become Holy Paladins. Also, the overall vision of Paladins in D&D has changed quite a bit over the years, but especially in 5e. The question of alignment has changed as well. There are certainly very hard differences between a demon and a Holy Paladin. Yet the boundaries are a bit more fluid.
Paladins have been known to set aside certain alignment differences in order to obtain a highly important goal.
None of this means that any of this has to apply to your Paladin.
Yes, please. I was wondering the same thing: Where are the Githzerai?
Edit: the once nameless slave-race of the illithids were led to a successful rebellion by Gith, who developed first defensive psionic powers to resist her masters. Later there was a split of the race and some followed Gith to become the Githyanki, and the others her son Zertimon to become the Githzerai. The githyanki planned to hunt down every last illithid, while the githzerai planned to finally have a life of their own. They pitched their tents on the plane of Limbo, while the githyanki went into the astral plane after making their deal with Tiamat about the red dragons. Githzerai are philosophers and interested in self-improvement, one of their favorite classes was monk.
Oath of Vengeance, and Oath of Conquest would both work with Evil alignments as long as the end goal aligned and it didn't prevent them from doing what they do.
Oath of Peace would work them as well depending on the situation.
Oath of Ancients would try to "convert" them back to good.
Oath of Devotion is really the only one that would be like "No sir you are a villain and thus i must smite thee".
so YOU are misunderstanding how Paladins work in 5e DnD. they aren't the "stick up the ass boyscout". Honestly they never were either (as it was more dependant upon the God they served) it's just dumb players and ♥♥♥♥♥♥ DMs that treated them that way.