Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As was this
Nope... please finish BG3 first.
The promised but unfortunately missing content in Act 3 has to be handed in later before other projects are considered, there can hardly be any doubt about that.
The walkable Upper City was promised - so implement it!
Agree about DOS2, having 2 different health bars for magic and physical damage was one of the most retarded design decisions I've ever seen in an RPG. It completely ruined the combat, basically forcing you to specialize your party into one damage type if you want to play optimal. And the story was meh too, so I quit in act 2.
BG3 is great though, great combat, interesting story and characters.
Just because YOU don't agree does not make a game "overrated".
Majority wins, not you.
Yep
Nope
Except it went UP as more reviews came in. It started lower. We'll see.
Either way, unless Starfield comes in and sweep in a similar score, BG3 will be GOTY. They would only have given it to Zelda if there was no other competition as it is just a BOTW DLC so to speak.
Anyone comfortable in their own skin and their ability to judge the quality of their own gaming experience would simply form their own opinion about it.
That's true, but with the hype it could at least help more good cRPGs to appear in the future. :)