Ranger/Paladin Multiclass

[Zero]

Possible? Plausible? Probable? I'm interested in the idea has anyone attempted it?

[Hex]

Messaggio originale di MrJ:

Messaggio originale di Hex:

As opposed to some worthless lvl3 spells you could get and less hp? Lol, you could just be an EK with 1 feat to get champ abilities and get much more out of it.

Sorry but I've tried reading your reply about 20 times and, for the life of me, I can't even figure out what you think you're disagreeing with, let alone your actual disagreement.

To reiterate my point - if you're leveling past 6, in a martial class, you're better off leveling fighter instead; the upgrades you get from levels 2-4 in fighter are better than what you get between 7-12 in other martial classes.

The point was, that if you plan to "dip" into fighter for some weird reasons, it's much better to go full EK instead.

[MrJ]

Messaggio originale di Hex:

The point was, that if you plan to "dip" into fighter for some weird reasons, it's much better to go full EK instead.

Ah, I get you now, I just completely disagree lol.
I mean, I can see a ton of reasons to play barb, rogue, monk, pally or ranger and, if you are playing those classes, it's worth getting some levels in fighter, for the reason I already stated.
If you want to argue it's just "better to go full EK", that's fine, but you're essentially arguing to not play any other martial class, which is different to arguing that multiclassing is 'worthless'

[Hex]

Messaggio originale di MrJ:

Messaggio originale di Hex:

The point was, that if you plan to "dip" into fighter for some weird reasons, it's much better to go full EK instead.

Ah, I get you now, I just completely disagree lol.
I mean, I can see a ton of reasons to play barb, rogue, monk, pally or ranger and, if you are playing those classes, it's worth getting some levels in fighter, for the reason I already stated.
If you want to argue it's just "better to go full EK", that's fine, but you're essentially arguing to not play any other martial class, which is different to arguing that multiclassing is 'worthless'

I meant specifically if you want to multiclass a caster and a martial class. EK and AT is always a batter choice than making a fighter/wizard or a rogue/wizard. Barb also has a Barb/Sorc subclass and if you want wisdom based figher/something, Druid of the Moon can toss around serious magic and then when he is out of steam maul stuff.

There is a "multiclass" sub-class for every class.

[MrJ]

Messaggio originale di Hex:

I meant specifically if you want to multiclass a caster and a martial class. EK and AT is always a batter choice than making a fighter/wizard or a rogue/wizard. Barb also has a Barb/Sorc subclass and if you want wisdom based figher/something, Druid of the Moon can toss around serious magic and then when he is out of steam maul stuff.

There is a "multiclass" sub-class for every class.

Well that makes more sense. :P
tbh I would avoid multiclassing any caster, just for the spell slot issues alone. The only exception would be sorc/warlock, but I'm not sure how viable they are in BG3 anyway

[Operation40]

I've always thought of Paladin as already a mix of Fighter + Cleric

[Army of Optimists]

Messaggio originale di MrJ:

Messaggio originale di Hex:

I meant specifically if you want to multiclass a caster and a martial class. EK and AT is always a batter choice than making a fighter/wizard or a rogue/wizard. Barb also has a Barb/Sorc subclass and if you want wisdom based figher/something, Druid of the Moon can toss around serious magic and then when he is out of steam maul stuff.

There is a "multiclass" sub-class for every class.

Well that makes more sense. :P
tbh I would avoid multiclassing any caster, just for the spell slot issues alone. The only exception would be sorc/warlock, but I'm not sure how viable they are in BG3 anyway

Given the way BG3 works right now, it's actually better to multiclass EVERY pure caster (except Warlock, since they're not real casters) with one level of Wizard. You get the entire spellbook of Wizard spells with no loss of spell slots, giving you incredible versatility with no real loss.

[dakinritchie9]

Messaggio originale di Onsight:

All that matters is whether it makes sense for your character/internal storyline. Prioritize that! People that prioritize stats/effectiveness are losers, nerds, and are doomed to be forever miserable.

Sounds like you are the miserable one questioning what people perceive as fun.