Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Congratulations, you're in third person.
You can zoom in to basically look over your characters shoulder, however that is not a perspective that at all lends itself to playing large parts of the game in.
Gameplay what I've seen of the game so far hasn't been third person but more top down like Age of Empires.
It's a shame, but I kind of thought so. I find it really stupid. It's like, your character is standing around somewhere and you're looking at the map, really disconnected from the character. True to the motto: "You stay there, I'll look at the map in the meantime." Too bad actually. If this were like The Witcher III: Wild Hunt, I'd celebrate it. But clicking and commanding characters like that, then I can also play Company of Heroes... well, thanks for the answer.
In actual dnd, battle maps are also from a top-down perspective, because it's the only way to actually display it, and people never had a problem with that
No you will like it, buy 2 copies.
The odds are if the stipulation was rtwp we would bot have gotten bg3 at all, and it certainly wouldn't be on this level. However to best represent DnD mechanics turn based is the best choice not rtwp like the previous titles. That said rywp still wouldn't be 3rd person as you control a whole party usually so still wouldn't appeal to this guy who wanted 3rd person.